Why are these two NSString pointers the same?

て烟熏妆下的殇ゞ 提交于 2019-11-29 10:17:50

There are three things going on here:

Firstly, the two identical string literals you're passing in to initWithString: will have the same address to start. This is an obvious optimization for constant data.

Secondly, when you nest alloc and init with strings, the runtime performs an optimization, the alloc call essentially becomes a no-op. This is done using the NSPlaceholderString class. This means the pointer you get back here will be coming from initWithString:, not from alloc.

Thirdly, under the hood, initWithString: is calling CFStringCreateCopy, which as you may find, has the following behavior: Since this routine is for creating immutable strings, it has an optimization. It simply calls CFRetain() and returns the same object that was passed in.

Thanks for the very interesting question. I had fun figuring it out.

@"hello world" strings are of class NSConstantString.if you use @"hello world" in two places, they will be referencing the very same object.

From documentation.

The simplest way to create a string object in source code is to use the Objective-C @"..." construct:

NSString *temp = @"/tmp/scratch"; Note that, when creating a string constant in this fashion, you should use UTF-8 characters. Such an object is created at compile time and exists throughout your program’s execution. The compiler makes such object constants unique on a per-module basis, and they’re never deallocated, though you can retain and release them as you do any other object. You can also send messages directly to a string constant as you do any other string:

BOOL same = [@"comparison" isEqualToString:myString];

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!