I often find myself writing something like
int computedValue = ...;
return MAX(0, MIN(5, computedValue));
I would like to be able to write this as a single one-line macro. It must be free of side effects, in the same way that the existing system macros MIN and MAX are, and should work for the same data types as MIN and MAX.
Can anyone show me how to turn this into a single macro?
This is without side effects and works for any primitive number:
#define MIN(A,B) ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __a : __b; })
#define MAX(A,B) ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __b : __a; })
#define CLAMP(x, low, high) ({\
__typeof__(x) __x = (x); \
__typeof__(low) __low = (low);\
__typeof__(high) __high = (high);\
__x > __high ? __high : (__x < __low ? __low : __x);\
})
Can be used like so
int clampedInt = CLAMP(computedValue, 3, 7);
double clampedDouble = CLAMP(computedValue, 0.5, 1.0);
Other suggested names instead of CLAMP
can be VALUE_CONSTRAINED_LOW_HIGH
, BOUNDS
, CLIPPED
.
Taken from this site http://developer.gnome.org/glib/2.34/glib-Standard-Macros.html#CLAMP:CAPS
#define CLAMP(x, low, high) (((x) > (high)) ? (high) : (((x) < (low)) ? (low) : (x)))
Maybe you want to try it like that:
template <class T>
const T& clamp(const T& value, const T& low, const T& high) {
return value < low ? low:
value > high? high:
value;
}
#define MAX(a, b) (((a) > (b)) ? (a) : (b))
#define MIN(a, b) (((a) > (b)) ? (b) : (a))
making it in one #define directive isn't going to be very readable.
Using just one compare operation:
static inline int clamp(int value, int min, int max) {
return min + MIN((unsigned int)(value - min), max - min)
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14769603/how-can-i-write-a-clamp-clip-bound-macro-for-returning-a-value-in-a-gi