Why are Rails model association results not naturally ActiveRecord::Relations?

烈酒焚心 提交于 2019-11-29 03:48:19

It is an ActiveRecord::Relation, but Rails is intentionally lying to you. You can see this already in the method calls, and continue to see it by calling ancestors, which includes a slew of ActiveRecord classes:

c1.articles.ancestors.select { |c| c.to_s =~ /ActiveRecord/ }.size  #=> 35

which shows that it is very much not an Array.

This happens because what you’re getting back when calling c1.articles is an ActiveRecord::Associations::CollectionProxy*, which undefines class (along with many other methods). This means that class gets delegated via its method_missing, which sends it to target. As we can see, the class of target here is, in fact, Array:

c1.articles.target.class  #=> Array

That is where c1.articles.class comes from. Nevertheless, it is an ActiveRecord::Relation.

* We can verify that it is indeed an ActiveRecord::Associations::CollectionProxy by calling Ruby’s original class method on the object in question: Object.instance_method(:class).bind(c1.articles).call. This is a nice trick to verify that the object is not trying to pretend to be of a different class.

Because when you define association, it places in your model:

def #{name}(*args)
  association(:#{name}).reader(*args)
end

.reader() returns AssociationProxy, which removes the .class method and delegates unknown methods to @target through .method_missing.

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!