Is it true that a default constructor is synthesized for every class that does not define one?

问题

If the class doesn't have the constructor, will the compiler make one default constructor for it ?

Programmers new to C++ often have two common misunderstandings:

That a default constructor is synthesized for every class that does not define one

from the book Inside the C++ Object Model

I am at a loss...

回答1:

This is well explained in the section from which this quote is taken. I will not paraphrase it in its entirety, but here is a short summary of the section content.

First of all, you need to understand the following terms: implicitly-declared, implicitly-defined, trivial, non-trivial and synthesized (a term that is used by Stanley Lippman, but is not used in the standard).

implicitly-declared

A constructor is implicitly-declared for a class if there is no user-declared constructor in this class. For example, this class struct T { }; does not declare any constructor, so the compiler implicitly declares a default constructor. On the other hand, this class struct T { T(int); }; declares a constructor, so the compiler will not declare an implicit default constructor. You will not be able to create an instance of T without parameters, unless you define your own default constructor.

implicitly-defined

An implicitly-declared constructor is implicitly-defined when it is used, i.e. when an instance is created without parameters. Assuming the following class struct T { };, the line T t; will trigger the definition of T::T(). Otherwise, you would have a linker error since the constructor would be declared but not defined. However, an implicitly-defined constructor does not necessarily have any code associated with it! A default constructor is synthesized (meaning that some code is created for it) by the compiler only under certain circumstances.

trivial constructor

An implicitly-declared default constructor is trivial when:

its class has no virtual functions and no virtual base classes and
its base classes have trivial constructors and
all its non-static members have trivial constructors.

In this case, the default compiler has nothing to do, so there is no code synthesized for it. For instance, in the following code

struct Trivial
{
    int i;
    char * pc;
};

int main()
{
    Trivial t;
}

the construction of t does not involve any operations (you can see that by looking at the generated assembly: no constructor is called to construct t).

non-trivial

On the other hand, if the class does not meet the three requirements stated above, its implicitly-declared default constructor will be non-trivial, meaning that it will involve some operations that must be performed in order to respect the language semantics. In this case, the compiler will synthesize an implementation of the constructor performing these operations.

For instance, consider the following class:

struct NonTrivial
{
    virtual void foo();
};

Since it has a virtual member function, its default constructor must set the virtual table pointer to the correct value (assuming the implementation use a virtual method table, of course).

Similarly, the constructor of this class

struct NonTrivial
{
    std::string s;
};

must call the string default constructor, as it is not trivial. To perform these operations, the compiler generates the code for the default constructor, and calls it anytime you create an instance without parameters. You can check this by looking at the assembly corresponding to this instantiation NonTrivial n; (you should see a function call, unless the constructor has been inlined).

Summary

When you don't provide any constructor for your class, the compiler implicitly declares a default one. If you try to use it, the compiler implicitly defines it, if it can (it is not always possible, for instance when a class has a non-default-constructible member). However, this implicit definition does not imply the generation of any code. The compiler needs to generate code for the constructor (synthesize it) only if it is non-trivial, meaning that it involves certain operations needed to implement the language semantics.

N.B.

Stanley B Lippman's "Inside the C++ object model" and this answer deals with (a possible) implementation of C++, not its semantics. As a consequence, none of the above can be generalized to all compilers: as far as I know, an implementation is perfectly allowed to generate code even for a trivial constructor. From the C++ user point of view, all that matters is the "implicitly-declared/defined` aspect (and also the trivial/non-trivial distinction, as it has some implications (for instance, an object of a class with non-trivial constructor cannot be a member of a union)).

回答2:

I think the misconception is:

That a default constructor is synthesized for every class that does not define one

That people think the default constructor, which accepts no arguments, will always be generated if you don't declare it yourself.

However, this is not true, because if you declare any constructor yourself, the default one will not be automatically created.

class MyClass {
public:
    MyClass(int x) {}; // No default constructor will be generated now
};

This will lead to problems like when beginners expect to use MyClass like this:

MyClass mc;

Which won't work because there is no default constructor that accepts no args.

edit as OP is still a little confused.

Imagine that my MyClass above was this:

class MyClass {
};

int main() {
    MyClass m;
}

That would compile, because the compiler will autogenerate the default constructor MyClass() because MyClass was used.

Now take a look at this:

#include <iostream>

class MyClass {

};

int main() {
    std::cout << "exiting\n";
}

If this were the only code around, the compiler wouldn't even bother generating the default constructor, because MyClass is never used.

Now this:

#include <iostream>

class MyClass {
public:
    MyClass(int x = 5) { _x = x; }
    int _x;
};

int main() {
    MyClass m;
    std::cout << m._x;
}

The compiler doesn't generate default constructor MyClass(), because the class already has a constructor defined by me. This will work, and MyClass(int x = 5) works as your default constructor because it can accept no arguments, but it wasn't generated by the compiler.

And finally, where beginners might run into a problem:

class MyClass() {
public:
    MyClass(int x) { _x = x; }
    int _x;
};

int main() {
    MyClass m;
}

The above will throw you an error during compilation, because MyClass m needs a default constructor (no arguments) to work, but you already declared a constructor that takes an int. The compiler will not generate a no-argument constructor in this situation either.

回答3:

A default constructor is synthesized for every class that does not define one if:

The code using the class needs one & only if
There is no other constructor explicitly defined for the class by you.

回答4:

All the upvoted answers thus far seem to say approximately the same thing:

A default constructor is synthesized for every class that does not have any user-defined constructor.

which is a modification of the statement in the question, which means

A default constructor is synthesized for every class that does not have a user-defined default constructor.

The difference is important, but the statement is still wrong.

A correct statement would be:

A default constructor is synthesized for every class that does not have any user-defined constructor and for which all sub-objects are default-constructible in the context of the class.

Here are some clear counter-examples to the first statement:

struct NoDefaultConstructor
{
     NoDefaultConstructor(int);
};

class Surprise1
{
     NoDefaultConstructor m;
} s1; // fails, no default constructor exists for Surprise1

class Surprise1 has no user-defined constructors, but no default constructor is synthesized.

It doesn't matter whether the subobject is a member or a base:

class Surprise2 : public NoDefaultConstructor
{
} s2; // fails, no default constructor exists for Surprise2

Even if all subobjects are default-constructible, the default constructor has to be accessible from the composite class:

class NonPublicConstructor
{
protected:
    NonPublicConstructor();
};

class Surprise3
{
    NonPublicConstructor m;
} s3; // fails, no default constructor exists for Surprise3

回答5:

Yes a default constructor is always there by default if you don't define a constructor of your own (see the default constructor section here).

回答6:

http://www.codeguru.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-257648.html

Quote:

The following sentense are got from the book "Inside the C++ object model" , written by Stanley B. Lippman.

There are four characteristics of a class under which the compiler needs to synthesize a default constructor for classes that declare no constructor at all. The Standard refers to these as implicit, nontrivial default constructors. The synthesized constructor fulfills only an implementation need. It does this by invoking member object or base class default constructors or initializing the virtual function or virtual base class mechanism for each object. Classes that do not exhibit these characteristics and that declare no constructor at all are said to have implicit, trivial default constructors. In practice, these trivial default constructors are not synthesized. ... Programmers new to C++ often have two common misunderstandings:

That a default constructor is synthesized for every class that does not define one

That the compiler-synthesized default constructor provides explicit default initializers for each data member declared within the class

As you have seen, neither of these is true.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9635772/is-it-true-that-a-default-constructor-is-synthesized-for-every-class-that-does-n

标签

c++