How to make a bash function which can read from standard input?

问题

I have some scripts that work with parameters, they work just fine but i would like them to be able to read from stdin, from a pipe for example, an example, suppose this is called read:

#!/bin/bash
function read()
{
 echo $*
}

read $*

Now this works with read "foo" "bar", but I would like to use it as:

echo "foo" | read

How do I accomplish this?

回答1:

You can use <<< to get this behaviour. read <<< echo "text" should make it.

Test with readly (I prefer not using reserved words):

function readly()
{
 echo $*
 echo "this was a test"
}

$ readly <<< echo "hello"
hello
this was a test

With pipes, based on this answer to "Bash script, read values from stdin pipe":

$ echo "hello bye" | { read a; echo $a;  echo "this was a test"; }
hello bye
this was a test

回答2:

It's a little tricky to write a function which can read standard input, but works properly when no standard input is given. If you simply try to read from standard input, it will block until it receives any, much like if you simply type cat at the prompt.

In bash 4, you can work around this by using the -t option to read with an argument of 0. It succeeds if there is any input available, but does not consume any of it; otherwise, it fails.

Here's a simple function that works like cat if it has anything from standard input, and echo otherwise.

catecho () {
    if read -t 0; then
        cat
    else
        echo "$*"
    fi
}

$ catecho command line arguments
command line arguments
$ echo "foo bar" | catecho
foo bar

This makes standard input take precedence over command-line arguments, i.e., echo foo | catecho bar would output foo. To make arguments take precedence over standard input (echo foo | catecho bar outputs bar), you can use the simpler function

catecho () {
    if [ $# -eq 0 ]; then
        cat
    else
        echo "$*"
    fi
}

(which also has the advantage of working with any POSIX-compatible shell, not just certain versions of bash).

回答3:

To combine a number of other answers into what worked for me (this contrived example turns lowercase input to uppercase):

  uppercase() {
    local COMMAND='tr [:lower:] [:upper:]'
    if [ -t 0 ]; then
      if [ $# -gt 0 ]; then
        echo "$*" | ${COMMAND}
      fi
    else
      cat - | ${COMMAND} 
    fi
  }

Some examples (the first has no input, and therefore no output):

:; uppercase
:; uppercase test
TEST
:; echo test | uppercase 
TEST
:; uppercase <<< test
TEST
:; uppercase < <(echo test)
TEST

Step by step:

test if file descriptor 0 (/dev/stdin) was opened by a terminal
```
if [ -t 0 ]; then
```
tests for CLI invocation arguments
```
if [ $# -gt 0 ]; then
```
echo all CLI arguments to command
```
echo "$*" | ${COMMAND}
```
else if stdin is piped (i.e. not terminal input), output stdin to command (cat - and cat are shorthand for cat /dev/stdin)
```
else
  cat - | ${COMMAND}
```

回答4:

Here is example implementation of sprintf function in bash which uses printf and standard input:

sprintf() { local stdin; read -d '' -u 0 stdin; printf "$@" "$stdin"; }

Example usage:

$ echo bar | sprintf "foo %s"
foo bar

This would give you an idea how function can read from standard input.

回答5:

Late to the party here. Building off of @andy's answer, here's how I define my to_uppercase function.

if stdin is not empty, use stdin
if stdin is empty, use args
if args are empty, do nothing

to_uppercase() {
  local input="$([[ -p /dev/stdin ]] && cat - || echo "$@")"
  [[ -n "$input" ]] && echo "$input" | tr '[:lower:]' '[:upper:]' 
}

Usages:

$ to_uppercase 
$ to_uppercase abc
ABC
$ echo abc | to_uppercase 
ABC
$ to_uppercase <<< echo abc 
ABC

Bash version info:

$ bash --version
GNU bash, version 3.2.57(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin17)

回答6:

I've discovered that this can be done in one line using test and awk...

    test -p /dev/stdin  && awk '{print}' /dev/stdin

The test -p tests for input on a pipe, which accepts input via stdin. Only if input is present do we want to run the awk since otherwise it will hang indefinitely waiting for input which will never come.

I've put this into a function to make it easy to use...

inputStdin () {
  test -p /dev/stdin  && awk '{print}' /dev/stdin  && return 0
  ### accepts input if any but does not hang waiting for input
  #
  return 1
}

Usage...

_stdin="$(inputStdin)"

Another function uses awk without the test to wait for commandline input...

inputCli () {
  local _input=""
  local _prompt="$1"
  #
  [[ "$_prompt" ]]  && { printf "%s" "$_prompt" > /dev/tty; }
  ### no prompt at all if none supplied
  #
  _input="$(awk 'BEGIN {getline INPUT < "/dev/tty"; print INPUT}')"
  ### accept input (used in place of 'read')
  ###   put in a BEGIN section so will only accept 1 line and exit on ENTER
  ###   WAITS INDEFINITELY FOR INPUT
  #
  [[ "$_input" ]]  && { printf "%s" "$_input"; return 0; }
  #
  return 1
}

Usage...

_userinput="$(inputCli "Prompt string: ")"

Note that the > /dev/tty on the first printf seems to be necessary to get the prompt to print when the function is called in a Command Substituion $(...).

This use of awk allows the elimination of the quirky read command for collecting input from keyboard or stdin.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18761209/how-to-make-a-bash-function-which-can-read-from-standard-input

标签

bash

pipe

stdin