From the man page:
Deletes all stale tracking branches under <name>. These stale branches have already been removed from the remote repository referenced by <name>, but are still locally available in "remotes/<name>".
So I removed a bunch of branches using
git push origin :staleStuff
and then ran
git remote prune origin
However, only one single local branch was pruned. Some of these branches were created by me, some by co-workers. Does this indicate that I wasn't tracking those branches correctly in the first place?
When you use git push origin :staleStuff, it automatically removes origin/staleStuff, so when you ran git remote prune origin, you have pruned some branch that was removed by someone else. It's more likely that your co-workers now need to run git prune to get rid of branches you have removed.
So what exactly git remote prune does? Main idea: local branches (not tracking branches) are not touched by git remote prune command and should be removed manually.
Now, a real-world example for better understanding:
You have a remote repository with 2 branches: master and feature. Let's assume that you are working on both branches, so as a result you have these references in your local repository (full reference names are given to avoid any confusion):
refs/heads/master(short namemaster)refs/heads/feature(short namefeature)refs/remotes/origin/master(short nameorigin/master)refs/remotes/origin/feature(short nameorigin/feature)
Now, a typical scenario:
- Some other developer finishes all work on the
feature, merges it intomasterand removesfeaturebranch from remote repository. - By default, when you do
git fetch(orgit pull), no references are removed from your local repository, so you still have all those 4 references. - You decide to clean them up, and run
git remote prune origin. - git detect that
featurebranch no longer exists, sorefs/remotes/origin/featureis a stale branch which should be removed. - Now you have 3 references, including
refs/heads/feature, becausegit remote prunedoes not remove anyrefs/heads/*references.
It is possible to identify local branches, associated with remote tracking branches, by branch.<branch_name>.merge configuration parameter. This parameter is not really required for anything to work (probably except git pull), so it might be missing.
(updated with example & useful info from comments)
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4040717/git-remote-prune-didnt-show-as-many-pruned-branches-as-i-expected