Mac OS X: Getting detailed process information (specifically its launch arguments) for arbitrary running applications using its PID

ε祈祈猫儿з 提交于 2019-11-28 12:15:53
outis

You could use whatever ps uses, though it isn't cocoa based. According to Singh, ps is based on kvm and sysctl calls. Pouring over the source, the pertinant calls seem to be kvm_openfiles, kvm_getprocs and kvm_getargv. To get the command line arguments, first call kvm_openfiles to get access to the kernel memory space, then use kvm_getprocs to get kernel process info, then kvm_getargv.

The use of sysctl in ps seems less relevant to your goal; it's used to get other information, such as the group ID and parent proces ID. The particular sysctl name used is {CTL_KERN, KERN_PROC, KERN_PROC_which, flags}, where which specifies a process filter (e.g. ALL, PID) and flags are arguments for the filter (the details are in the sysctl man page).

OS X doesn't have support procfs, but Singh developed a FUSE based version, released under GPLv2. If you bundle it with your application, you'll have to release it under GPLv2 as well. Most of MacFUSE is released under a BSD-style license, so it can be distributed with your app without making it open source (fusefs/fuse_nodehash.c is released under Apple's open source license, but it also allows linking to closed source apps).

The question "Get other process' argv in OS X using C" should be of use, as it has sample code using kvm and sysctl. TN 2050 "Observing Process Lifetimes Without Polling" may also be of use to you.

Nope - running ps is your best bet. Standard process info interfaces aren't supported on OS X (noop versions were provided in OS X 10.4, but removed thereafter) and the private interfaces are likely to change between OS X revisions.

If you're willing to lock yourself into a single OS X version, all the source is available, for example for ps or libproc; you'll also need to run as root.

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!