问题
TL;DR Basically, I am looking for this:
docker push myimage ssh://myvps01.vpsprovider.net/
I am failing to grasp the rationale behind whole Docker Hub / Registry thing. I know I can run a private registry, but for that I have to set up the infrastructure of actually running a server.
I took a sneak peek inside the inner workings of Docker (well, the filesystem at least), and it looks like Docker image layers are just a bunch of tarballs, more or less, with some elaborate file naming. I naïvely think it would not be impossible to whip up a simple Python script to do distributed push/pull, but of course I did not try, so that is why I am asking this question.
Are there any technical reasons why Docker could not just do distributed (server-less) push/pull, like Git or Mercurial?
I think this would be a tremendous help, since I could just push the images that I built on my laptop right onto the app servers, instead of first pushing to a repo server somewhere and then pulling from the app servers. Or maybe I have just misunderstood the concept and the Registry is a really essential feature that I absolutely need?
EDIT Some context that hopefully explains why I want this, consider the following scenario:
- Development, testing done on my laptop (OSX, running Docker machine, using docker-compose for defining services and dependencies)
- Deploy to a live environment by means of a script (self-written, bash, few dependencies on dev machine, basically just Docker machine)
- Deploy to a new VPS with very few dependencies except SSH access and Docker daemon.
- No "permanent" services running anywhere, i.e. I specifically don't want to host a permanently running registry (especially not accessible to all the VPS instances, though that could probably be solved with some clever SSH tunneling)
The current best solution is to use Docker machine to point to the VPS server and rebuild it, but it slows down deployment as I have to build the container from source each time.
回答1:
If you want to push docker images to a given host, there is already everything in Docker to allow this. The following example shows how to push a docker image through ssh:
docker save <my_image> | ssh -C user@my.remote.host.com docker load
- docker save will produce a tar archive of one of your docker images (including its layers)
-Cis for ssh to compress the data stream- docker load creates a docker image from a tar archive
Note that the combination of a docker registry + docker pull command has the advantage of only downloading missing layers. So if you frequently update a docker image (adding new layers, or modifying a few last layers) then the docker pull command would generate less network traffic than pushing complete docker images through ssh.
回答2:
Saving/loading an image on to a Docker host and pushing to a registry (private or Hub) are two different things.
The former @Thomasleveil has already addressed.
The latter actually does have the "smarts" to only push required layers.
You can easily test this yourself with a private registry and a couple of derived images.
If we have two images and one is derived from the other, then doing:
docker tag baseimage myregistry:5000/baseimage
docker push myregistry:5000/baseimage
will push all layers that aren't already found in the registry. However, when you then push the derived image next:
docker tag derivedimage myregistry:5000/derivedimage
docker push myregistry:5000/derivedimage
you may noticed that only a single layer gets pushed - provided your Dockerfile was built such that it only required one layer (e.g. chaining of RUN parameters, as per Dockerfile Best Practises).
On your Docker host, you can also run a Dockerised private registry.
See Containerized Docker registry
To the best of my knowledge and as of the time of writing this, the registry push/pull/query mechanism does not support SSH, but only HTTP/HTTPS. That's unlike Git and friends.
See Insecure Registry on how to run a private registry through HTTP, especially be aware that you need to change the Docker engine options and restart it:
Open the /etc/default/docker file or /etc/sysconfig/docker for editing.
Depending on your operating system, your Engine daemon start options.
Edit (or add) the DOCKER_OPTS line and add the --insecure-registry flag.
This flag takes the URL of your registry, for example.
DOCKER_OPTS="--insecure-registry myregistrydomain.com:5000"
Close and save the configuration file.
Restart your Docker daemon
You will also find instruction to use self-signed certificates, allowing you to use HTTPS.
Using self-signed certificates
[...]This is more secure than the insecure registry solution. You must configure every docker daemon that wants to access your registry
Generate your own certificate: mkdir -p certs && openssl req \ -newkey rsa:4096 -nodes -sha256 -keyout certs/domain.key \ -x509 -days 365 -out certs/domain.crt Be sure to use the name myregistrydomain.com as a CN. Use the result to start your registry with TLS enabled Instruct every docker daemon to trust that certificate. This is done by copying the domain.crt file to /etc/docker/certs.d/myregistrydomain.com:5000/ca.crt. Don’t forget to restart the Engine daemon.
回答3:
I made a command line utility just for this scenario.
It sets up a temporary private docker registry on the server, establishes an SSH Tunnel from your localhost, pushes your image, then cleans up after itself.
The benefit of this approach over docker save is that only the new layers are pushed to the server, resulting in a quicker upload.
Oftentimes using an intermediate registry like dockerhub is undesirable, and cumbersome.
https://github.com/brthor/docker-push-ssh
Install:
pip install docker-push-ssh
Example:
docker-push-ssh -i ~/my_ssh_key username@myserver.com my-docker-image
Biggest caveat is that you have to manually add your local ip to docker's insecure_registries config.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32808215/where-to-set-the-insecure-registry-flag-on-mac-os
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31575546/docker-image-push-over-ssh-distributed