Python lambda with if but without else

和自甴很熟 提交于 2020-11-30 02:43:06

问题


I was writing some lambda functions and couldn't figure this out. Is there a way to have something like lambda x: x if (x<3) in python? As lambda a,b: a if (a > b) else b works ok. So far lambda x: x < 3 and x or None seems to be the closest i have found.


回答1:


A lambda, like any function, must have a return value.

lambda x: x if (x<3) does not work because it does not specify what to return if not x<3. By default functions return None, so you could do

lambda x: x if (x<3) else None

But perhaps what you are looking for is a list comprehension with an if condition. For example:

In [21]: data = [1, 2, 5, 10, -1]

In [22]: [x for x in data if x < 3]
Out[22]: [1, 2, -1]



回答2:


I found that filter provided exactly what I was looking for:

>>> data = [1, 2, 5, 10, -1]
>>> filter(lambda x: x < 3, data)
[1, 2, -1]

The implementation is the same in both 2.x and 3.x.




回答3:


What's wrong with lambda x: x if x < 3 else None?




回答4:


You can always try to invoke 'filter' for conditional checks. Fundamentally, map() has to work on every occurrence of the iterables, so it cannot pick and choose. But filter may help narrow down the choices. For example, I create a list from 1 to 19 but want to create a tuple of squares of only even numbers.

x = list(range(1,20))

y = tuple(map(lambda n: n**2, filter(lambda n: n%2==0,x)))

print (y)


来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12709062/python-lambda-with-if-but-without-else

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!