I am playing around a bit with my program (trying to multicore a few parts) and I've noticed the "CPU history" looks a bit different, depend on how many workers I start. 2-4 workers seems to produce a "stable" workflow, however pegging 5-8 workers produces erratic behavior (from zero to max, see pictures). I should point out that all runs started out with "smooth" max capacity (e.g. 2 cores with only 25%), and started to exhibit erratic behavior only after a minute or so. What's going on? I have 4 core processor, and do you think this behavior may be related to this fact?
I hope you can see the pics.
2 workers
3 workers
4 workers
5 workers
6 workers
7 workers
8 workers
This is classic behaviour on a quad-core with hyperthreading. R doesn't gain with hyperthreading, as it uses often the complete core for the calculations. Thus, if one physical processor makes 2 logical ones, the processor has to switch continuously between both threads, which explains the patterns.
For R, I put off the hyperthreading on my computer. It just doesn't help, in contrary. When working with only one thread as R does normally, you lose capacity (max is 12.5% instead of 25%).
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3547831/different-behavior-when-using-different-number-of-multicoring-workers