Old-style callbacks synchronisation using observables

问题

I have following scenario - 4 callback functions A,B,C,D which are called form old-style like library (which use some API requests inside so execution time is unknown/random but proper order of results (by finished task time) is important for me) - and I want to synchronise data which they return to one obserwable result string using rxjs.

function getData() {

  // --- BELOW Part can be EDIT ---

  let obs = new ReplaySubject(1); // this is example you can use an type

  function A(n) { 
    let r= 'A'.repeat(n);
  }

  function B(n) {
    let r= 'B'.repeat(n);
  }

  function C(n) {
    let r= 'C'.repeat(n);
  }

  function D(n) {
    let r= 'D'.repeat(n);
    obs.next(r);
  }
  
  // --- BELOW Part can NOT be edit ---

  runLib(A,B,C,D)   
  return obs
}

In below snippet value of finalResult is DDDDD which is wrong. Proper value of finalResult string should be AADDDDDCCCCBBB.

// SET-UP - NOT EDIT Below code
const { of, Observable, ReplaySubject } = rxjs;
const { map, switchMap, delay } = rxjs.operators; // example

// simulated lib functions
function libA(callback) { setTimeout( _=>callback(2), 1000); } 
function libB(callback) { setTimeout( _=>callback(3), 3000); }
function libC(callback) { setTimeout( _=>callback(4), 2000); }
function libD(callback) { setTimeout( _=>callback(5), 1500); }

function runLib(cA,cB,cC,cD) {
    libA( cA ); libB( cB ); libC( cC ); libD( cD );
}

getData().subscribe(finalResult => {
  console.log(finalResult) // The result is WRONG here!
}, e=>{}, _=> console.log('finished - unsubscribed'));


function getData() {

  // --- BELOW Part can be EDIT ---

  let obs = new ReplaySubject(1); // this is example, you can use diffrend observale kind

  function A(n) { 
    let r= 'A'.repeat(n);
  }

  function B(n) {
    let r= 'B'.repeat(n);
  }

  function C(n) {
    let r= 'C'.repeat(n);
  }

  function D(n) {
    let r= 'D'.repeat(n);
    obs.next(r);
  }
  
  // --- BELOW Part can NOT be edit ---

  runLib(A,B,C,D)   
  return obs
}

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/rxjs/6.5.5/rxjs.umd.min.js" integrity="sha256-85uCh8dPb35sH3WK435rtYUKALbcvEQFC65eg+raeuc=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>

In snippet I mark code inside getData() which can be edit in solution (may be it looks little awkward but this is exactly what I need) (you can also find there finalResult but not edit that part of code). It is possible? How to do it?

回答1:

The best thing to do in such case is to wrap the library functions to return Observable and then use forkJoin to wait for all the results.

I took your code and modified it to get the desired result, you would need to:

in each callback emit the result to a subject.
return an Observable which wait for n emission - in this case 4
map the emissions into a single string

The final getData function will look like this:

function getData() {
  // --- BELOW Part can be EDIT ---
  const result$: Subject<string> = new Subject<string>();
  const obs = result$.asObservable().pipe(
    bufferCount(4), // or any desired number of callback
    map((results: string[]) => results.join(''))
  );

  function A(n) {
    let r = "A".repeat(n);
    result$.next(r);
  }

  function B(n) {
    let r = "B".repeat(n);
    result$.next(r);
  }

  function C(n) {
    let r = "C".repeat(n);
    result$.next(r);
  }

  function D(n) {
    let r = "D".repeat(n);
    result$.next(r);
  }

  // --- BELOW Part can NOT be edit ---

  runLib(A, B, C, D);
  return obs;
}

You can find the full code in this stackblitz or run below snippet

// SET-UP - NOT EDIT Below code
const { Subject } = rxjs;
const { take, bufferCount, map } = rxjs.operators; // example

// simulated lib functions
function libA(callback) { setTimeout( _=>callback(2), 1000); } 
function libB(callback) { setTimeout( _=>callback(3), 3000); }
function libC(callback) { setTimeout( _=>callback(4), 2000); }
function libD(callback) { setTimeout( _=>callback(5), 1500); }

function runLib(cA,cB,cC,cD) {
    libA( cA ); libB( cB ); libC( cC ); libD( cD );
}

getData().subscribe(finalResult => {
  console.log(finalResult) // The result is WRONG here!
}, e=>{},_=> console.log('finished - unsubscribed'));


function getData() {
  // --- BELOW Part can be EDIT ---
  const result$ = new Subject();

  function A(n) {
    let r = "A".repeat(n);
    result$.next(r);
  }

  function B(n) {
    let r = "B".repeat(n);
    result$.next(r);
  }

  function C(n) {
    let r = "C".repeat(n);
    result$.next(r);
  }

  function D(n) {
    let r = "D".repeat(n);
    result$.next(r);
  }

  const obs = result$.pipe(
    bufferCount(4), // or any desired number of callback
    take(1),
    map(results=> results.join``)
  );

  // --- BELOW Part can NOT be edit ---

  runLib(A, B, C, D);
  return obs;
}

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/rxjs/6.5.5/rxjs.umd.min.js" integrity="sha256-85uCh8dPb35sH3WK435rtYUKALbcvEQFC65eg+raeuc=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>

回答2:

How about the following: (I like @Tal Ohana's answer, but the subject in his solution will never bet unsubscribed which may result in a memory lick)

function getData() {

  let obs = new Subject<string>();

    function A(n: number) {
      let r = 'A'.repeat(n);
      obs.next(r);
    }

    function B(n: number) {
      let r = 'B'.repeat(n);
      obs.next(r);
    }

    function C(n: number) {
      let r = 'C'.repeat(n);
      obs.next(r);
    }

    function D(n: number) {
      let r = 'D'.repeat(n);
      obs.next(r);
    }

    runLib(A, B, C, D)

  return obs.pipe(
      scan((acc, value) => acc + value),
      take(4),
      last()
    )
}

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63072094/old-style-callbacks-synchronisation-using-observables

标签

javascript

rxjs