问题
I can think of several ways to turn matrix (data frame) of this type:
dat = data.frame(
x1 = rep(c('a', 'b'), 100),
x2 = rep(c('x', 'y'), 100)
)
head(dat)
x1 x2
1 a x
2 b y
3 a x
4 b y
5 a x
6 b y
Into a binary (indicator) matrix (or data frame) like this:
a b x y
1 0 1 0
0 1 0 1
...
(This structure is, of course, trivial and only for illustrative purpose!)
Many thanks!
回答1:
We can use table
tbl <- table(rep(1:nrow(dat),2),unlist(dat))
head(tbl, 2)
# a b x y
# 1 1 0 1 0
# 2 0 1 0 1
Or a possibly efficient option would be
library(Matrix)
sM <- sparse.model.matrix(~ -1 + x1 +x2, dat,
contrasts.arg = lapply(dat, contrasts, contrasts = FALSE))
colnames(sM) <- sub(".*\\d", "", colnames(sM))
head(sM, 2)
# 2 x 4 sparse Matrix of class "dgCMatrix"
# a b x y
#1 1 . 1 .
#2 . 1 . 1
It can be converted to binary by converting to matrix
head(as.matrix(sM),2)
# a b x y
#1 1 0 1 0
#2 0 1 0 1
回答2:
There are some good solutions posted already, but none are optimal for performance. We can optimize performance by looping over each input column, and then looping over each factor level index within each input column and doing a straight integer comparison of the factor indexes. It's not the most concise or elegant piece of code, but it's fairly straightforward and fast:
do.call(cbind,lapply(dat,function(col)
`colnames<-`(do.call(cbind,lapply(seq_along(levels(col)),function(i)
as.integer(as.integer(col)==i)
)),levels(col))
));
Performance:
library(Matrix);
library(data.table);
library(microbenchmark);
bgoldst <- function(dat) do.call(cbind,lapply(dat,function(col) `colnames<-`(do.call(cbind,lapply(seq_along(levels(col)),function(i) as.integer(as.integer(col)==i))),levels(col))));
akrun1 <- function(dat) table(rep(1:nrow(dat),2),unlist(dat));
akrun2 <- function(dat) sparse.model.matrix(~-1+x1+x2,dat,contrasts.arg=lapply(dat,contrasts,contrasts=FALSE));
davidar <- function(dat) { dat[,rowid:=.I]; dcast(melt(dat,id='rowid'),rowid~value,length); }; ## requires a data.table
dataminer <- function(dat) t(apply(dat,1,function(x) as.numeric(unique(unlist(dat))%in%x)));
N <- 100L; dat <- data.frame(x1=rep(c('a','b'),N),x2=rep(c('x','y'),N)); datDT <- setDT(copy(dat));
identical(unname(bgoldst(dat)),matrix(as.vector(akrun1(dat)),ncol=4L));
## [1] TRUE
identical(unname(bgoldst(dat)),unname(matrix(as.integer(as.matrix(akrun2(dat))),ncol=4L)));
## [1] TRUE
identical(bgoldst(dat),as.matrix(davidar(datDT)[,rowid:=NULL]));
## [1] TRUE
identical(unname(bgoldst(dat)),matrix(as.integer(dataminer(dat)),ncol=4L));
## [1] TRUE
N <- 100L;
dat <- data.frame(x1=rep(c('a','b'),N),x2=rep(c('x','y'),N)); datDT <- setDT(copy(dat));
microbenchmark(bgoldst(dat),akrun1(dat),akrun2(dat),davidar(datDT),dataminer(dat));
## Unit: microseconds
## expr min lq mean median uq max neval
## bgoldst(dat) 67.570 92.374 106.2853 99.6440 121.2405 188.596 100
## akrun1(dat) 581.182 652.386 773.6300 690.6605 916.4625 1192.299 100
## akrun2(dat) 4429.208 4836.119 5554.5902 5145.3135 5977.0990 11263.537 100
## davidar(datDT) 5064.273 5498.555 6104.7621 5664.9115 6203.9695 11713.856 100
## dataminer(dat) 47577.729 49529.753 55217.3726 53190.8940 60041.9020 74346.268 100
N <- 1e4L;
dat <- data.frame(x1=rep(c('a','b'),N),x2=rep(c('x','y'),N)); datDT <- setDT(copy(dat));
microbenchmark(bgoldst(dat),akrun1(dat),akrun2(dat),davidar(datDT));
## Unit: milliseconds
## expr min lq mean median uq max neval
## bgoldst(dat) 1.775617 1.820949 2.299493 1.84725 1.972124 8.362336 100
## akrun1(dat) 38.954524 41.109257 48.409613 45.60304 52.147633 162.365472 100
## akrun2(dat) 16.915832 17.762799 21.288200 19.20164 23.775180 46.494055 100
## davidar(datDT) 36.151684 38.366715 42.875940 42.38794 45.916937 58.695008 100
N <- 1e5L;
dat <- data.frame(x1=rep(c('a','b'),N),x2=rep(c('x','y'),N)); datDT <- setDT(copy(dat));
microbenchmark(bgoldst(dat),akrun1(dat),akrun2(dat),davidar(datDT));
## Unit: milliseconds
## expr min lq mean median uq max neval
## bgoldst(dat) 17.16473 22.97654 35.01815 26.76662 31.75562 152.6188 100
## akrun1(dat) 501.72644 626.14494 671.98315 680.91152 727.88262 828.8313 100
## akrun2(dat) 212.12381 242.65505 298.90254 272.28203 357.65106 429.6023 100
## davidar(datDT) 368.04924 461.60078 500.99431 511.54921 540.39358 638.3840 100
回答3:
If you have a data.frame as you are showing (not a matrix), you could as well recast the data
library(data.table)
setDT(dat)[, rowid := .I] # Creates a row index
res <- dcast(melt(dat, id = "rowid"), rowid ~ value, length) # long/wide format
head(res)
# rowid a b x y
# 1 1 1 0 1 0
# 2 2 0 1 0 1
# 3 3 1 0 1 0
# 4 4 0 1 0 1
# 5 5 1 0 1 0
# 6 6 0 1 0 1
Some benchmarks
dat = data.frame(
x1 = rep(c('a', 'b'), 1e3),
x2 = rep(c('x', 'y'), 1e3)
)
library(data.table)
library(Matrix)
library(microbenchmark)
dat2 <- copy(dat)
microbenchmark("akrun1 : " = table(rep(1:nrow(dat),2),unlist(dat)),
"akrun2 : " = sparse.model.matrix(~ -1 + x1 +x2, dat, contrasts.arg = lapply(dat, contrasts, contrasts = FALSE)),
"DatamineR : " = t(apply(dat,1, function(x) as.numeric(unique(unlist(dat)) %in% x))),
"David Ar : " = {setDT(dat2)[, rowid := .I] ; dcast(melt(dat2, id = "rowid"), rowid ~ value, length)},
times = 10L)
# Unit: milliseconds
# expr min lq mean median uq max neval cld
# akrun1 : 3.826075 4.061904 6.654399 5.165376 11.26959 11.82029 10 a
# akrun2 : 5.269531 5.713672 8.794434 5.943422 13.34118 20.01961 10 a
# DatamineR : 3199.336286 3343.774160 3410.618547 3385.756972 3517.22133 3625.70909 10 b
# David Ar : 8.092769 8.254682 11.030785 8.465232 15.44893 19.83914 10 a
The apply solution is highly inefficient and will take forever on a bigger data set. Comparing for a bigger data set while excluding the apply solution
dat = data.frame(
x1 = rep(c('a', 'b'), 1e4),
x2 = rep(c('x', 'y'), 1e4)
)
dat2 <- copy(dat)
microbenchmark("akrun1 : " = table(rep(1:nrow(dat),2),unlist(dat)),
"akrun2 : " = sparse.model.matrix(~ -1 + x1 +x2, dat, contrasts.arg = lapply(dat, contrasts, contrasts = FALSE)),
#"DatamineR : " = t(apply(dat,1, function(x) as.numeric(unique(unlist(dat)) %in% x))),
"David Ar : " = {setDT(dat2)[, rowid := .I] ; dcast(melt(dat2, id = "rowid"), rowid ~ value, length)},
times = 100L)
# Unit: milliseconds
# expr min lq mean median uq max neval cld
# akrun1 : 38.66744 41.27116 52.97982 42.72534 47.17203 161.0420 100 b
# akrun2 : 17.02006 18.93534 27.27582 19.35580 20.72022 153.2397 100 a
# David Ar : 34.15915 37.91659 46.11050 38.58536 41.40412 149.0038 100 b
Seems like the Matrix package shines for a bigger data sets.
It probably worth comparing different scenarios when there are more columns/unique values too.
回答4:
One alternative using apply
head(t(apply(dat,1, function(x) as.numeric(unique(unlist(dat)) %in% x))))
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]
[1,] 1 0 1 0
[2,] 0 1 0 1
[3,] 1 0 1 0
[4,] 0 1 0 1
[5,] 1 0 1 0
[6,] 0 1 0 1
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36531594/most-efficient-way-to-turn-factor-matrix-into-binary-indicator-matrix-in-r