Is there a portable equivalent to DebugBreak()/__debugbreak?

问题

In MSVC, DebugBreak() or __debugbreak cause a debugger to break. On x86 it is equivalent to writing "_asm int 3", on x64 it is something different. When compiling with gcc (or any other standard compiler) I want to do a break into debugger, too. Is there a platform independent function or intrinsic? I saw the XCode question about that, but it doesn't seem portable enough.

Sidenote: I mainly want to implement ASSERT with that, and I understand I can use assert() for that, but I also want to write DEBUG_BREAK or something into the code.

回答1:

What about defining a conditional macro based on #ifdef that expands to different constructs based on the current architecture or platform.

Something like:

#ifdef _MSC_VER
#define DEBUG_BREAK __debugbreak()
#else
...
#endif

This would be expanded by the preprocessor the correct debugger break instruction based on the platform where the code is compiled. This way you always use DEBUG_BREAK in your code.

回答2:

A method that is portable to most POSIX systems is:

raise(SIGTRAP);

回答3:

GCC has a builtin function named __builtin_trap which you can see here, however it is assumed that code execution halts once this is reached.

you should ensure that the __builtin_trap() call is conditional, otherwise no code will be emitted after it.

this post fueled by all of 5 minutes of testing, YMMV.

回答4:

This looks like an appropriate compat library https://github.com/scottt/debugbreak

回答5:

I just added a module to portable-snippets (a collection of public domain snippets of portable code) to do this. It's not 100% portable, but it should be pretty robust:

__builtin_debugtrap for some versions of clang (identified with __has_builtin(__builtin_debugtrap))
On MSVC and Intel C/C++ Compiler: __debugbreak
For ARM C/C++ Compiler: __breakpoint(42)
For x86/x86_64, assembly: int $03
For ARM Thumb, assembly: .inst 0xde01
For ARM AArch64, assembly: .inst 0xd4200000
For other ARM, assembly: .inst 0xe7f001f0
For Alpha, assembly: bpt
For non-hosted C with GCC (or something which masquerades as it), __builtin_trap
Otherwise, include signal.h and
- If defined(SIGTRAP) (i.e., POSIX), raise(SIGTRAP)
- Otherwise, raise(SIGABRT)

In the future the module in portable-snippets may expand to include other logic and I'll probably forget to update this answer, so you should look there for updates. It's public domain (CC0), so feel free to steal the code.

回答6:

If you consider assert(x) portable enough, assert(false) seems to be the obvious portable solution to your problem.

回答7:

This seems to be a very good, portable solution to this question: https://github.com/scottt/debugbreak

The header provided in the repository cited (debugbreak.h) encapsulates MSVC's

    __debugbreak,

and

    __asm__ volatile("int $0x03");

on i386 and x86_64, and on ARM it implements

    __asm__ volatile(".inst 0xe7f001f0");

as well as documenting some workarounds for problems noted in the header for single-stepping past the breakpoint in GDB plus a Python script for extending GDB on those platforms where stepi or cont get stuck. The script adds debugbreak-step and debugbreak-continue to GDB.

回答8:

If you are trying to debug a crash-related condition, good old fashioned abort() will give you a call stack on most platforms. Downside is that you can't continue from the current PC, which you probably don't want to do anyway.

http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/cstdlib/abort/

回答9:

Instead of using 'normal' debug breaks, why not use one of the following, like a divide by zero:

int iCrash = 13 / 0;

or dereference a NULL pointer:

BYTE bCrash = *(BYTE *)(NULL);

At least this is portable accross many platforms/architectures.

In many debuggers you can specify what action you want to perform on what exceptions so you can act accordingly when one of the above is hit (like pause execution, ala an "int 3" instruction) and an exception is generated.

回答10:

#define __debugbreak() \
do \
{       static bool b; \
        while (!b) \
                sleep(1); \
        b = false; \
} while (false)

When the process is sleeping, you can attach a debugger to the process, change the variable b to break the loop and do your thing. This code might not work in an optimized build!

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/173618/is-there-a-portable-equivalent-to-debugbreak-debugbreak

标签

c++

portability

debugbreak