Is this a valid LGPL scenario? [closed]

半世苍凉 提交于 2020-01-16 01:19:28

问题


Suppose I have Project X under closed source. It references/links to component Y which is LGPL, we make modifications to component Y

1) We release Project X binaries with the source to the modified component Y

OR

2) We contribute component Y modifications back upstream (to the original author(s)) and release Project X binaries without component Y source.

Does any of these scenarios comply with the LGPL?


回答1:


1) is fine.

2) is not: you have to distribute y source (or at least a written offer to do so). Your users would have a hard time looking for your modification in depths of upstream patch repository (a bug tracker, whatever).




回答2:


Option (1) is certainly OK. Option (2) is probably not, because there is no real way of "contributing modifications upstream".



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1067884/is-this-a-valid-lgpl-scenario

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!