Stack's package.yaml vs stack.yaml

问题

Stack has supported hpack's package.yaml configuration files since at least around this commit, as far as I can tell, but there's not much documentation about the differences between it and the stack.yaml file.

One of the few links I've found talking about it is this documentation, where it says:

package.yaml is a file format supported by hpack. It adds some niceties on top of cabal. For example, hpack has YAML syntax support and will automatically generate of exposed-modules lists. However, it's just a frontend to cabal package files.

So from this, it seems like package.yaml provides a superset of the *.cabal file's configuration ability, like the stack.yaml file also does.

---

The documentation here implies stack.yaml is the configuration file:

Next, let's look at our stack.yaml file, which gives our project-level settings.

...and later says that package.yaml is for storing dependencies:

To tell stack to use text, you need to add it to your package.yaml file — specifically in your dependencies section...

There's this related question, but it sadly doesn't clarify the difference between the two files.

I've been using package.yaml for all my project's configurations, and never using stack.yaml.

---

So, what is the relationship between stack's package.yaml and stack.yaml files? If/when their responsibilities overlap, which is it better practice to use?

回答1:

So from this, it seems like package.yaml provides a superset of the *.cabal file's configuration ability, like the stack.yaml file also does.

stack.yaml does not provide a superset of *.cabal configurations.

---

The *.cabal file is the package-level configuration. It can be generated by hpack from a package.yaml. This configuration provides essential information about the package: dependencies, exported components (libraries, executables, test suites), and settings for the build process (preprocessors, custom Setup.hs).

The stack.yaml file is the project-level configuration, which specifies a particular environment to make a build reproducible, pinning versions of compiler and dependencies. This is usually specified by a resolver (such as lts-11.4).

stack.yaml is not redundant with package.yaml. package.yaml specifies what dependencies are needed. stack.yaml indicates one way to consistently resolve dependencies (specific package version, and/or where to get it from, for example: on Hackage, a remote repository, or a local directory).

stack.yaml is most useful to developers: we don't want our build to suddenly break because a dependency upgraded while working on another project, hence we pin everything with stack.yaml. This file is less useful to users, who may have external constraints (typically, versions are already fixed by some distribution).

• In many cases, just specifying the resolver in stack.yaml is enough. Hence new stack users usually don't need to worry about configuring stack.yaml.

• A resolver specifies a curated set of packages with specific versions (the standard ones are listed on stackage.org). If a dependency of the package is missing from the chosen resolver, then it must be listed in the extra-deps field of stack.yaml.

• A project can span multiple packages, that thus get added to the packages field of stack.yaml, so they can be built in a single common environment and depend on each other.

• Another common use case is to create many stack.yaml (with different names) to easily test various configurations (e.g., GHC versions or package flags).

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49774055/stacks-package-yaml-vs-stack-yaml