问题
When a buffer gets deleted (the "bd[elete]" command), it not only deletes the buffer but also removes the split window that buffer was in.
Is there a way to delete/unload a buffer and keep the window split?
回答1:
I really like bufkill.vim there is a github repo as well
回答2:
bp|bd # will do it.
Details:bp("buffer previous") moves us to a different buffer in the current window (bn would work, too), then bd # ("buffer delete" "alternate file") deletes the buffer we just moved away from. See: help bp, help bd, help alternate-file.
回答3:
You can add the following to your .vimrc to have Bd work as bd but without touching the window splits:
command Bd bp\|bd \#
I found this as a useful complement to what Mud answered.
回答4:
See deleting a buffer without closing the window on VIM tips wiki.
回答5:
I do something similar to @Mud, but switch to previous view buffer, #, instead of the previous buffer in buffer list. Here is a binding key in my .vimrc:
nnoremap <silent> <leader>q :lclose<bar>b#<bar>bd #<CR>
Close Location windows, if exist, switch to the previous view buffer, and then close the last switched buffer.
回答6:
My Choice is
:sb # | bd #
:sb 1 | bd #
: <1. Recall Buffer> | <2. Delete Buffer>
Think Like that! /// <1. Recall Buffer> | <2. Delete Buffer>
:vert sb 2 | bd #
:vert sb <tab key~completed file(buffer)name> | bd #
why?! It's easy to remember 3 (+ 1) keyword!
- sb split_buffer
- bd delete buffer ▶ simple 2 keywords
- # or Number of buffer
- vert ▶ short_form of vertical (split_buffer or else)
That are easy and very useful in many other many case!
Have a nice Day! :)
回答7:
I used to use :
:bp<bar>sp<bar>bn<bar>bd<CR>
But I found certain occasions where it closed my window. On top of that the next or previous buffer might not be what you want to be displayed in the split.
Now I do this :
- switch to the buffer I want to work on
- Delete the alternate buffer
nnoremap <leader>d :bd#<CR>
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4465095/vim-delete-buffer-without-losing-the-split-window