Can a JavaScript object have a prototype chain, but also be a function?

空扰寡人 提交于 2019-12-27 14:56:45

问题


function a () {
    return "foo";
}

a.b = function () {
    return "bar";
}

function c () { };
c.prototype = a;

var d = new c();
d.b(); // returns "bar"
d(); // throws exception, d is not a function

Is there some way for d to be a function, and yet still inherit properties from a?


回答1:


Based on a discussion on meta about a similar question I'm posting this answer here based on @alexander-mills original


This can now be done in a standards compliant way

First create an object which inherits Function

const obj = Object.create(Function.prototype);  // Ensures availability of call, apply ext

Then add you custom methods and properties to obj

Next declare the function

const f = function(){
    // Hello, World!
};

And set obj as the prototype of f

Object.setPrototypeOf(f,obj);

Demonstraction

const obj = Object.create(Function.prototype);

// Define an 'answer' method on 'obj'
obj.answer = function() {
  // Call this object
  this.call(); // Logs 'Hello, World'
  console.log('The ultimate answer is 42');
}

const f = function() {
  // Standard example
  console.log('Hello, World');
};

Object.setPrototypeOf(f, obj);

// 'f' is now an object with an 'answer' method
f.answer();
// But is still a callable function
f();



回答2:


Actually, it turns out that this is possible, albeit in a non-standard way.

Mozilla, Webkit, Blink/V8, Rhino and ActionScript provide a non-standard __proto__ property, which allow changing the prototype of an object after it has been created. On these platforms, the following code is possible:

function a () {
    return "foo";
}

a.b = function () {
    return "bar";
}

function c () {
    return "hatstand";
}
c.__proto__ = a;

c(); // returns "hatstand"
c.b(); // returns "bar"; inherited from a

This might be of use to anyone who doesn't need to worry about cross-platform compatibility.

However, note that only the properties of an object can be inherited. For example:

var d = {};
d.__proto__ = a;
d.b(); // returns "bar"
d(); // throws exception -- the fact that d is inheriting from a function
     // doesn't make d itself a function.



回答3:


Short answer: not possible.

This line of your code:

var d = new c();

automatically assumes that d is an object. Unless c is a constructor of a builtin object, e.g., Function. But if c is already defined by the language, you cannot manipulate its prototype, and cannot "inherit" it from whatever you like. Well, in some interpreters you can, but you cannot do it safely across all interpreters — the standard says: "you doth not mess with standard objects or the interpreter will smite you!".

The builtin objects are "unique" and JavaScript does not provide ways to duplicate them. It is not possible to recreate String, Number, Function, and so on without resorting to incompatible trickery.




回答4:


Yes, it is possible if you use the __proto__ property Daniel Cassidy mentioned. The trick is to have c actually return a function that has had a attached to its prototype chain.

function a () {
    return "foo";
}

a.b = function () {
    return "bar";
}

function c () {
    var func = function() {
        return "I am a function";
    };
    func.__proto__ = a;
    return func;
}
c.prototype = a;

var d = new c();
d.b(); // returns "bar"
d(); // returns "I am a function"

However, you'll need to do some more tweaking of the prototype chain if you want instanceof to return better results.

d instanceof c // true
d instanceof a // false
c instanceof a // false



回答5:


Does it have to actually be a prototype chain? You can use a mixin pattern to make a function have all of the properties of a instead. You can even wrap it in a nice "new" syntax to fake it if you really want.

function a () {
    return "foo";
}

a.b = function () {
    return "bar";
}

function c () {
    var f = function(){
        return a();
    };

    //mixin all properties on a
    for(var prop in a){
        f[prop] = a[prop];
    }

    return f; //just returns the function instead of "this"
};

var d = new c(); //doesn't need the new keyword, but just for fun it still works

alert(d()); //show "foo"

alert(d.b()); //shows "bar"

You can add properties to d without affecting a. The only difference between this and what you want is that changes to a will not affect existing "instances" of c.




回答6:


This is something I've been trying to do for a while now. Special thanks to the authors above for their input.

Here is a chained implementation of using a "callable-object":

var $omnifarious = (function(Schema){

    var fn = function f(){
        console.log('ran f!!!');
        return f;
    };

    Schema.prototype = {
        w: function(w){ console.log('w'); return this; },
        x: function(x){ console.log('x'); return this; },
        y: function(y){ console.log('y'); return this; }
    };
    fn.__proto__ = (new Schema()).__proto__;

    return fn;
})(function schema(){ console.log('created new schema', this); });

console.log(
    $omnifarious()().w().x().y()()()
);

Also, with this "Schema" approach, it may be possible to create a reusable interface using Object.freeze() on Schema's prototype or __proto__ object. That might look something like this: fn.__proto__ = Object.freeze(new Schema().__proto__) -- this is not a practical example and more may be needed. That said, its a different discussion. Try it out and let me know!

Hope this is helpful.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/340383/can-a-javascript-object-have-a-prototype-chain-but-also-be-a-function

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!