一、三次握手过程
在TCP/IP协议中，TCP协议提供可靠的连接服务，采用三次握手建立一个连接。如下图所示：
首先，客户端开始的时候，首先创建sock文件描述符，接着就进行connect发起连接服务器请求，阻塞等待服务器应答。
接着，服务器开始的时候，分配一个listen_sock文件描述符，接着进行bind绑定，绑定完毕之后进行listen监听，最后进行accept，此时阻塞等待客户端的连接。连接建立accept返回之后，分配一个新的文件描述符与客户端通信。
第一次握手：Client先产生一个初始序列号seq：8000，SYN标志位置1，将该数据包发送给Server端，之后Client端进入SYN_SENT状态，等待Client确认。
第二次握手：Server收到数据包后也发送自己的SYN报文作为响应，并初始化序列号seq=15000，为了确认Client的seq，Server将Client发送的seq加1作为ACK发送给Client，Server进入SYN_RCVD状态。
第三次握手：为了确认Server的SYN，Client将Server发送的seq加1作为ACK发送给Server。Client和Server进入ESTABLISHED状态，完成三次握手，随后Client与Server之间可以开始传输数据了。
通过这样的三次握手，客户端和服务端建立起可靠的全双工的连接，开始传送数据。三次握手的最主要目的是保证连接是全双工的，可靠更多的是通过重传机制来保证的。
TCP状态转换图：
结合状态转换图来看三次握手：
CLOSED：起始点，在超时或者连接关闭时候进入此状态，这并不是一个真正的状态，而是这个状态图的假想起点和终点。
LISTEN：服务器端等待连接的状态。服务器经过socket，bind，listen函数之后进入此状态，开始监听客户端发过来的连接请求。此称为应用程序被动打开（等到客户端连接请求）。
SYN_SENT：第一次握手发生阶段，客户端发起连接。客户端调用connect，发送SYN给服务器端，然后进入SYN_SENT状态，等待服务器端确认（三次握手中的第二个报文）。如果服务器端不能连接，则直接进入CLOSED状态。
SYN_RCVD：第二次握手发生阶段，跟3对应，这里是服务器端接收到了客户端的SYN，此时服务器由LISTEN进入SYN_RCVD状态，同时服务器端回应一个ACK，然后再发送一个SYN即SYN+ACK给客户端。状态图中还描绘了这样一种情况，当客户端在发送SYN的同时也收到服务器端的SYN请求，即两个同时发起连接请求，那么客户端就会从SYN_SENT转换到SYN_REVD状态。
ESTABLISHED：第三次握手发生阶段，客户端接收到服务器端的ACK包（ACK，SYN）之后，也会发送一个ACK确认包，客户端进入ESTABLISHED状态，表明客户端这边已经准备好，但TCP需要两端都准备好才可以进行数据传输。服务器端收到客户端的ACK之后会从SYN_RCVD状态转移到ESTABLISHED状态，表明服务器端也准备好进行数据传输了。这样客户端和服务器端都是ESTABLISHED状态，就可以进行后面的数据传输了。所以ESTABLISHED也可以说是一个数据传送状态。
上面就是TCP三次握手过程的状态变迁。结合第一张三次握手过程图，从报文的角度看状态变迁：SYN_SENT状态表示已经客户端已经发送了SYN报文，SYN_RCVD状态表示服务器端已经接收到了SYN报文。
二、TCP协议源代码跟踪分析
1.TCP的三次握手从用户程序的角度看就是客户端connect和服务端accept建立起连接时背后的完成的工作。由上次的实验我们可以知道，在socket接口层这两个socket API函数分别对应着sys_connect和sys_accept4函数，课上老师说明， sys_connect和sys_accecpt是通过函数指针sock->opt->connect和sock->opt->accept调用了具体的函数来实现的，在即调用了tcp_v4_connect函数和inet_csk_accept函数，这两个函数进一步触及TCP数据收发过程tcp_transmit_skb和tcp_v4_rcv函数。
在net/ipv4/tcp-ipv4.c文件下的结构体变量struct proto tcp_prot指定了TCP协议栈的访问接口函数：
struct proto tcp_prot = {
.name = "TCP",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.close = tcp_close,
.pre_connect = tcp_v4_pre_connect,
.connect = tcp_v4_connect,
.disconnect = tcp_disconnect,
.accept = inet_csk_accept,
.ioctl = tcp_ioctl,
.init = tcp_v4_init_sock,
.destroy = tcp_v4_destroy_sock,
.shutdown = tcp_shutdown,
.setsockopt = tcp_setsockopt,
.getsockopt = tcp_getsockopt,
.keepalive = tcp_set_keepalive,
.recvmsg = tcp_recvmsg,
.sendmsg = tcp_sendmsg,
.sendpage = tcp_sendpage,
.backlog_rcv = tcp_v4_do_rcv,
.release_cb = tcp_release_cb,
.hash = inet_hash,
.unhash = inet_unhash,
.get_port = inet_csk_get_port,
.enter_memory_pressure = tcp_enter_memory_pressure,
.leave_memory_pressure = tcp_leave_memory_pressure,
.stream_memory_free = tcp_stream_memory_free,
.sockets_allocated = &tcp_sockets_allocated,
.orphan_count = &tcp_orphan_count,
.memory_allocated = &tcp_memory_allocated,
.memory_pressure = &tcp_memory_pressure,
.sysctl_mem = sysctl_tcp_mem,
.sysctl_wmem_offset = offsetof(struct net, ipv4.sysctl_tcp_wmem),
.sysctl_rmem_offset = offsetof(struct net, ipv4.sysctl_tcp_rmem),
.max_header = MAX_TCP_HEADER,
.obj_size = sizeof(struct tcp_sock),
.slab_flags = SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU,
.twsk_prot = &tcp_timewait_sock_ops,
.rsk_prot = &tcp_request_sock_ops,
.h.hashinfo = &tcp_hashinfo,
.no_autobind = true,
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
.compat_setsockopt = compat_tcp_setsockopt,
.compat_getsockopt = compat_tcp_getsockopt,
#endif
.diag_destroy = tcp_abort,
};
在这里，我们可以看到socket接口层里sock->opt->connect和sock->opt->accept实际调用的函数tcp_v4_connect和inet_csk_accept。
2.接下来通过MenuOS的内核调试环境设置断点跟踪tcp_v4_connect函数和inet_csk_accept函数来进一步验证三次握手的过程。
在tcp_v4_connect处打个断点：
可以发现tcp_v4_connect函数在net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c处定义，看下代码：
/* This will initiate an outgoing connection. */
int tcp_v4_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len)
{
struct sockaddr_in *usin = (struct sockaddr_in *)uaddr;
struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
__be16 orig_sport, orig_dport;
__be32 daddr, nexthop;
struct flowi4 *fl4;
struct rtable *rt;
int err;
struct ip_options_rcu *inet_opt;
struct inet_timewait_death_row *tcp_death_row = &sock_net(sk)->ipv4.tcp_death_row;
if (addr_len < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in))
return -EINVAL;
if (usin->sin_family != AF_INET)
return -EAFNOSUPPORT;
nexthop = daddr = usin->sin_addr.s_addr;
inet_opt = rcu_dereference_protected(inet->inet_opt,
lockdep_sock_is_held(sk));
if (inet_opt && inet_opt->opt.srr) {
if (!daddr)
return -EINVAL;
nexthop = inet_opt->opt.faddr;
}
orig_sport = inet->inet_sport;
orig_dport = usin->sin_port;
fl4 = &inet->cork.fl.u.ip4;
rt = ip_route_connect(fl4, nexthop, inet->inet_saddr,
RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk), sk->sk_bound_dev_if,
IPPROTO_TCP,
orig_sport, orig_dport, sk);
if (IS_ERR(rt)) {
err = PTR_ERR(rt);
if (err == -ENETUNREACH)
IP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), IPSTATS_MIB_OUTNOROUTES);
return err;
}
if (rt->rt_flags & (RTCF_MULTICAST | RTCF_BROADCAST)) {
ip_rt_put(rt);
return -ENETUNREACH;
}
if (!inet_opt || !inet_opt->opt.srr)
daddr = fl4->daddr;
if (!inet->inet_saddr)
inet->inet_saddr = fl4->saddr;
sk_rcv_saddr_set(sk, inet->inet_saddr);
if (tp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp && inet->inet_daddr != daddr) {
/* Reset inherited state */
tp->rx_opt.ts_recent = 0;
tp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp = 0;
if (likely(!tp->repair))
tp->write_seq = 0;
}
inet->inet_dport = usin->sin_port;
sk_daddr_set(sk, daddr);
inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ext_hdr_len = 0;
if (inet_opt)
inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ext_hdr_len = inet_opt->opt.optlen;
tp->rx_opt.mss_clamp = TCP_MSS_DEFAULT;
/* Socket identity is still unknown (sport may be zero).
* However we set state to SYN-SENT and not releasing socket
* lock select source port, enter ourselves into the hash tables and
* complete initialization after this.
*/
tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_SYN_SENT);
err = inet_hash_connect(tcp_death_row, sk);
if (err)
goto failure;
sk_set_txhash(sk);
rt = ip_route_newports(fl4, rt, orig_sport, orig_dport,
inet->inet_sport, inet->inet_dport, sk);
if (IS_ERR(rt)) {
err = PTR_ERR(rt);
rt = NULL;
goto failure;
}
/* OK, now commit destination to socket. */
sk->sk_gso_type = SKB_GSO_TCPV4;
sk_setup_caps(sk, &rt->dst);
rt = NULL;
if (likely(!tp->repair)) {
if (!tp->write_seq)
tp->write_seq = secure_tcp_seq(inet->inet_saddr,
inet->inet_daddr,
inet->inet_sport,
usin->sin_port);
tp->tsoffset = secure_tcp_ts_off(sock_net(sk),
inet->inet_saddr,
inet->inet_daddr);
}
inet->inet_id = tp->write_seq ^ jiffies;
if (tcp_fastopen_defer_connect(sk, &err))
return err;
if (err)
goto failure;
err = tcp_connect(sk);
if (err)
goto failure;
return 0;
failure:
/*
* This unhashes the socket and releases the local port,
* if necessary.
*/
tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
ip_rt_put(rt);
sk->sk_route_caps = 0;
inet->inet_dport = 0;
return err;
}
分析代码，可以看出tcp_v4_connect函数的主要作用就是发起一个TCP连接，从这个函数中可以看到它调用了IP层提供的一些服务，比如ip_route_connect和ip_route_newports，同时在tcp_v4_connect函数中，调用了tcp_set_state函数，它设置了TCP_SYN_SENT，并进一步调用了tcp_connect(sk)来实际构造SYN并发送出去。
tcp_connect函数具体负责构造一个携带SYN标志位的TCP头并发送出去，同时还设置了计时器超时重发。这个函数定义在net/ipv4/tcp_output.c文件中，看看代码：
/* Build a SYN and send it off. */
int tcp_connect(struct sock *sk)
{
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
struct sk_buff *buff;
int err;
tcp_call_bpf(sk, BPF_SOCK_OPS_TCP_CONNECT_CB, 0, NULL);
if (inet_csk(sk)->icsk_af_ops->rebuild_header(sk))
return -EHOSTUNREACH; /* Routing failure or similar. */
tcp_connect_init(sk);
if (unlikely(tp->repair)) {
tcp_finish_connect(sk, NULL);
return 0;
}
buff = sk_stream_alloc_skb(sk, 0, sk->sk_allocation, true);
if (unlikely(!buff))
return -ENOBUFS;
tcp_init_nondata_skb(buff, tp->write_seq++, TCPHDR_SYN);
tcp_mstamp_refresh(tp);
tp->retrans_stamp = tcp_time_stamp(tp);
tcp_connect_queue_skb(sk, buff);
tcp_ecn_send_syn(sk, buff);
tcp_rbtree_insert(&sk->tcp_rtx_queue, buff);
/* Send off SYN; include data in Fast Open. */
err = tp->fastopen_req ? tcp_send_syn_data(sk, buff) :
tcp_transmit_skb(sk, buff, 1, sk->sk_allocation);
if (err == -ECONNREFUSED)
return err;
/* We change tp->snd_nxt after the tcp_transmit_skb() call
* in order to make this packet get counted in tcpOutSegs.
*/
tp->snd_nxt = tp->write_seq;
tp->pushed_seq = tp->write_seq;
buff = tcp_send_head(sk);
if (unlikely(buff)) {
tp->snd_nxt = TCP_SKB_CB(buff)->seq;
tp->pushed_seq = TCP_SKB_CB(buff)->seq;
}
TCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), TCP_MIB_ACTIVEOPENS);
/* Timer for repeating the SYN until an answer. */
inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer(sk, ICSK_TIME_RETRANS,
inet_csk(sk)->icsk_rto, TCP_RTO_MAX);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_connect);
其中tcp_transmit_skb函数将tcp数据发送出去。
这边，客户端的一个tcp数据包发送出去了，服务端将做出什么反应呢，下面来看看服务端的inet_csk_accept函数，首先在inet_csk_accept处打上断点：
inet_csk_accept函数在net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c文件中：
/*
* This will accept the next outstanding connection.
*/
struct sock *inet_csk_accept(struct sock *sk, int flags, int *err, bool kern)
{
struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
struct request_sock_queue *queue = &icsk->icsk_accept_queue;
struct request_sock *req;
struct sock *newsk;
int error;
lock_sock(sk);
/* We need to make sure that this socket is listening,
* and that it has something pending.
*/
error = -EINVAL;
if (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN)
goto out_err;
/* Find already established connection */
if (reqsk_queue_empty(queue)) {
long timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & O_NONBLOCK);
/* If this is a non blocking socket don't sleep */
error = -EAGAIN;
if (!timeo)
goto out_err;
error = inet_csk_wait_for_connect(sk, timeo);
if (error)
goto out_err;
}
req = reqsk_queue_remove(queue, sk);
newsk = req->sk;
if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP &&
tcp_rsk(req)->tfo_listener) {
spin_lock_bh(&queue->fastopenq.lock);
if (tcp_rsk(req)->tfo_listener) {
/* We are still waiting for the final ACK from 3WHS
* so can't free req now. Instead, we set req->sk to
* NULL to signify that the child socket is taken
* so reqsk_fastopen_remove() will free the req
* when 3WHS finishes (or is aborted).
*/
req->sk = NULL;
req = NULL;
}
spin_unlock_bh(&queue->fastopenq.lock);
}
out:
release_sock(sk);
if (req)
reqsk_put(req);
return newsk;
out_err:
newsk = NULL;
req = NULL;
*err = error;
goto out;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_csk_accept);
服务端的inet_csk_accept函数会从请求队列中取出一个连接请求，如果队列为空则通过inet_csk_wait_for_connect阻塞住等待客户端的连接。
inet_csk_wait_for_connect函数定义在net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c文件中：
static int inet_csk_wait_for_connect(struct sock *sk, long timeo)
{
struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
int err;
for (;;) {
prepare_to_wait_exclusive(sk_sleep(sk), &wait,
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
release_sock(sk);
if (reqsk_queue_empty(&icsk->icsk_accept_queue))
timeo = schedule_timeout(timeo);
sched_annotate_sleep();
lock_sock(sk);
err = 0;
if (!reqsk_queue_empty(&icsk->icsk_accept_queue))
break;
err = -EINVAL;
if (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN)
break;
err = sock_intr_errno(timeo);
if (signal_pending(current))
break;
err = -EAGAIN;
if (!timeo)
break;
}
finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
return err;
}
观察函数恍然大悟，所谓的队列为空则阻塞住等待客户端的连接，就是指的函数中的for循环，一旦有请求进来则跳出循环。
根据代码可以分析出整个三次握手的过程为：客户端通过tcp_v4_connect函数调用到tcp_connect函数，将请求发送数据包出去，服务器端则通过inet_csk_accept函数调用inet_csk_wait_for_connect函数中的for循环进入阻塞，直到监听到请求才跳出循环。connect启动到返回和accept返回之间就是所谓三次握手的时间。
3.三次握手中携带SYN/ACK的TCP头数据的发送和接收
以上分析了用户程序调用socket接口、通过系统调用陷入内核进入内核态的socket接口层代码，然后根据创建socket时指定协议选择适当的函数指针进入协议处理代码中。那么网卡接收到数据后是如何通知上层协议来接收并处理数据的呢。其实在TCP/IP协议栈的初始化过程中，协议栈将handler赋值为tcp_v4_rcv的函数指针，也就是TCP协议中负责接收处理数据的入口，接收TCP连接请求及进行三次握手处理过程也都是从这里开始。
内核在处理接收到的TCP报文时使用了4个队列容器，分别为receive、out_of_order、prequeue、backlog队列。当网卡接收到报文并判断为TCP协议后，将会调用到内核的tcp_v4_rcv方法。tcp_v4_rcv方法会把这个报文直接插入到receive队列中。
在该函数定义在net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c文件中：
/*
* From tcp_input.c
*/
int tcp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
int sdif = inet_sdif(skb);
const struct iphdr *iph;
const struct tcphdr *th;
bool refcounted;
struct sock *sk;
int ret;
if (skb->pkt_type != PACKET_HOST)
goto discard_it;
/* Count it even if it's bad */
__TCP_INC_STATS(net, TCP_MIB_INSEGS);
if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct tcphdr)))
goto discard_it;
th = (const struct tcphdr *)skb->data;
if (unlikely(th->doff < sizeof(struct tcphdr) / 4))
goto bad_packet;
if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, th->doff * 4))
goto discard_it;
/* An explanation is required here, I think.
* Packet length and doff are validated by header prediction,
* provided case of th->doff==0 is eliminated.
* So, we defer the checks. */
if (skb_checksum_init(skb, IPPROTO_TCP, inet_compute_pseudo))
goto csum_error;
th = (const struct tcphdr *)skb->data;
iph = ip_hdr(skb);
lookup:
sk = __inet_lookup_skb(&tcp_hashinfo, skb, __tcp_hdrlen(th), th->source,
th->dest, sdif, &refcounted);
if (!sk)
goto no_tcp_socket;
process:
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT)
goto do_time_wait;
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV) {
struct request_sock *req = inet_reqsk(sk);
bool req_stolen = false;
struct sock *nsk;
sk = req->rsk_listener;
if (unlikely(tcp_v4_inbound_md5_hash(sk, skb))) {
sk_drops_add(sk, skb);
reqsk_put(req);
goto discard_it;
}
if (tcp_checksum_complete(skb)) {
reqsk_put(req);
goto csum_error;
}
if (unlikely(sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN)) {
inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop_and_put(sk, req);
goto lookup;
}
/* We own a reference on the listener, increase it again
* as we might lose it too soon.
*/
sock_hold(sk);
refcounted = true;
nsk = NULL;
if (!tcp_filter(sk, skb)) {
th = (const struct tcphdr *)skb->data;
iph = ip_hdr(skb);
tcp_v4_fill_cb(skb, iph, th);
nsk = tcp_check_req(sk, skb, req, false, &req_stolen);
}
if (!nsk) {
reqsk_put(req);
if (req_stolen) {
/* Another cpu got exclusive access to req
* and created a full blown socket.
* Try to feed this packet to this socket
* instead of discarding it.
*/
tcp_v4_restore_cb(skb);
sock_put(sk);
goto lookup;
}
goto discard_and_relse;
}
if (nsk == sk) {
reqsk_put(req);
tcp_v4_restore_cb(skb);
} else if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) {
tcp_v4_send_reset(nsk, skb);
goto discard_and_relse;
} else {
sock_put(sk);
return 0;
}
}
if (unlikely(iph->ttl < inet_sk(sk)->min_ttl)) {
__NET_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_TCPMINTTLDROP);
goto discard_and_relse;
}
if (!xfrm4_policy_check(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb))
goto discard_and_relse;
if (tcp_v4_inbound_md5_hash(sk, skb))
goto discard_and_relse;
nf_reset(skb);
if (tcp_filter(sk, skb))
goto discard_and_relse;
th = (const struct tcphdr *)skb->data;
iph = ip_hdr(skb);
tcp_v4_fill_cb(skb, iph, th);
skb->dev = NULL;
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
ret = tcp_v4_do_rcv(sk, skb);
goto put_and_return;
}
sk_incoming_cpu_update(sk);
bh_lock_sock_nested(sk);
tcp_segs_in(tcp_sk(sk), skb);
ret = 0;
if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
ret = tcp_v4_do_rcv(sk, skb);
} else if (tcp_add_backlog(sk, skb)) {
goto discard_and_relse;
}
bh_unlock_sock(sk);
put_and_return:
if (refcounted)
sock_put(sk);
return ret;
no_tcp_socket:
if (!xfrm4_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb))
goto discard_it;
tcp_v4_fill_cb(skb, iph, th);
if (tcp_checksum_complete(skb)) {
csum_error:
__TCP_INC_STATS(net, TCP_MIB_CSUMERRORS);
bad_packet:
__TCP_INC_STATS(net, TCP_MIB_INERRS);
} else {
tcp_v4_send_reset(NULL, skb);
}
discard_it:
/* Discard frame. */
kfree_skb(skb);
return 0;
discard_and_relse:
sk_drops_add(sk, skb);
if (refcounted)
sock_put(sk);
goto discard_it;
do_time_wait:
if (!xfrm4_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb)) {
inet_twsk_put(inet_twsk(sk));
goto discard_it;
}
tcp_v4_fill_cb(skb, iph, th);
if (tcp_checksum_complete(skb)) {
inet_twsk_put(inet_twsk(sk));
goto csum_error;
}
switch (tcp_timewait_state_process(inet_twsk(sk), skb, th)) {
case TCP_TW_SYN: {
struct sock *sk2 = inet_lookup_listener(dev_net(skb->dev),
&tcp_hashinfo, skb,
__tcp_hdrlen(th),
iph->saddr, th->source,
iph->daddr, th->dest,
inet_iif(skb),
sdif);
if (sk2) {
inet_twsk_deschedule_put(inet_twsk(sk));
sk = sk2;
tcp_v4_restore_cb(skb);
refcounted = false;
goto process;
}
}
/* to ACK */
/* fall through */
case TCP_TW_ACK:
tcp_v4_timewait_ack(sk, skb);
break;
case TCP_TW_RST:
tcp_v4_send_reset(sk, skb);
inet_twsk_deschedule_put(inet_twsk(sk));
goto discard_it;
case TCP_TW_SUCCESS:;
}
goto discard_it;
}
tcp_v4_rcv函数只要做以下几个工作：
(1) 设置TCP_CB
(2) 查找控制块
(3)根据控制块状态做不同处理，包括TCP_TIME_WAIT状态处理，TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV状态处理，TCP_LISTEN状态处理
(4) 接收TCP段
以上完成了将接收数据放入accept队列中，之后服务端接收客户端发来的tcp报文，并发送回SYN+ACK。
这里用到的是tcp_v4_do_rcv函数，其定义在net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c文件中：
/* The socket must have it's spinlock held when we get
* here, unless it is a TCP_LISTEN socket.
*
* We have a potential double-lock case here, so even when
* doing backlog processing we use the BH locking scheme.
* This is because we cannot sleep with the original spinlock
* held.
*/
int tcp_v4_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct sock *rsk;
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED) { /* Fast path */
struct dst_entry *dst = sk->sk_rx_dst;
sock_rps_save_rxhash(sk, skb);
sk_mark_napi_id(sk, skb);
if (dst) {
if (inet_sk(sk)->rx_dst_ifindex != skb->skb_iif ||
!dst->ops->check(dst, 0)) {
dst_release(dst);
sk->sk_rx_dst = NULL;
}
}
tcp_rcv_established(sk, skb);
return 0;
}
if (tcp_checksum_complete(skb))
goto csum_err;
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
struct sock *nsk = tcp_v4_cookie_check(sk, skb);
if (!nsk)
goto discard;
if (nsk != sk) {
if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) {
rsk = nsk;
goto reset;
}
return 0;
}
} else
sock_rps_save_rxhash(sk, skb);
if (tcp_rcv_state_process(sk, skb)) {
rsk = sk;
goto reset;
}
return 0;
reset:
tcp_v4_send_reset(rsk, skb);
discard:
kfree_skb(skb);
/* Be careful here. If this function gets more complicated and
* gcc suffers from register pressure on the x86, sk (in %ebx)
* might be destroyed here. This current version compiles correctly,
* but you have been warned.
*/
return 0;
csum_err:
TCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), TCP_MIB_CSUMERRORS);
TCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), TCP_MIB_INERRS);
goto discard;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_v4_do_rcv);
首先函数检查当前是否处于半连接状态，并调用tcp_v4_hnd_req检查报文的状态字段，再针对报文类型调用不同函数进行处理，若是SYN报文，则调用tcp_rcv_state_process函数，进入到下一阶段，客户端收到服务端的SYN+ACK，并发送ACK。
tcp_rcv_state_process函数定义在net/ipv4/tcp_input.c文件中：
/*
* This function implements the receiving procedure of RFC 793 for
* all states except ESTABLISHED and TIME_WAIT.
* It's called from both tcp_v4_rcv and tcp_v6_rcv and should be
* address independent.
*/
int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
const struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb);
struct request_sock *req;
int queued = 0;
bool acceptable;
switch (sk->sk_state) {
case TCP_CLOSE:
goto discard;
case TCP_LISTEN:
if (th->ack)
return 1;
if (th->rst)
goto discard;
if (th->syn) {
if (th->fin)
goto discard;
/* It is possible that we process SYN packets from backlog,
* so we need to make sure to disable BH and RCU right there.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
local_bh_disable();
acceptable = icsk->icsk_af_ops->conn_request(sk, skb) >= 0;
local_bh_enable();
rcu_read_unlock();
if (!acceptable)
return 1;
consume_skb(skb);
return 0;
}
goto discard;
case TCP_SYN_SENT:
tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
tcp_mstamp_refresh(tp);
queued = tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process(sk, skb, th);
if (queued >= 0)
return queued;
/* Do step6 onward by hand. */
tcp_urg(sk, skb, th);
__kfree_skb(skb);
tcp_data_snd_check(sk);
return 0;
}
tcp_mstamp_refresh(tp);
tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
req = tp->fastopen_rsk;
if (req) {
bool req_stolen;
WARN_ON_ONCE(sk->sk_state != TCP_SYN_RECV &&
sk->sk_state != TCP_FIN_WAIT1);
if (!tcp_check_req(sk, skb, req, true, &req_stolen))
goto discard;
}
if (!th->ack && !th->rst && !th->syn)
goto discard;
if (!tcp_validate_incoming(sk, skb, th, 0))
return 0;
/* step 5: check the ACK field */
acceptable = tcp_ack(sk, skb, FLAG_SLOWPATH |
FLAG_UPDATE_TS_RECENT |
FLAG_NO_CHALLENGE_ACK) > 0;
if (!acceptable) {
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV)
return 1; /* send one RST */
tcp_send_challenge_ack(sk, skb);
goto discard;
}
switch (sk->sk_state) {
case TCP_SYN_RECV:
tp->delivered++; /* SYN-ACK delivery isn't tracked in tcp_ack */
if (!tp->srtt_us)
tcp_synack_rtt_meas(sk, req);
/* Once we leave TCP_SYN_RECV, we no longer need req
* so release it.
*/
if (req) {
inet_csk(sk)->icsk_retransmits = 0;
reqsk_fastopen_remove(sk, req, false);
/* Re-arm the timer because data may have been sent out.
* This is similar to the regular data transmission case
* when new data has just been ack'ed.
*
* (TFO) - we could try to be more aggressive and
* retransmitting any data sooner based on when they
* are sent out.
*/
tcp_rearm_rto(sk);
} else {
tcp_init_transfer(sk, BPF_SOCK_OPS_PASSIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB);
tp->copied_seq = tp->rcv_nxt;
}
smp_mb();
tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_ESTABLISHED);
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
/* Note, that this wakeup is only for marginal crossed SYN case.
* Passively open sockets are not waked up, because
* sk->sk_sleep == NULL and sk->sk_socket == NULL.
*/
if (sk->sk_socket)
sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_IO, POLL_OUT);
tp->snd_una = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ack_seq;
tp->snd_wnd = ntohs(th->window) << tp->rx_opt.snd_wscale;
tcp_init_wl(tp, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
if (tp->rx_opt.tstamp_ok)
tp->advmss -= TCPOLEN_TSTAMP_ALIGNED;
if (!inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ca_ops->cong_control)
tcp_update_pacing_rate(sk);
/* Prevent spurious tcp_cwnd_restart() on first data packet */
tp->lsndtime = tcp_jiffies32;
tcp_initialize_rcv_mss(sk);
tcp_fast_path_on(tp);
break;
case TCP_FIN_WAIT1: {
int tmo;
/* If we enter the TCP_FIN_WAIT1 state and we are a
* Fast Open socket and this is the first acceptable
* ACK we have received, this would have acknowledged
* our SYNACK so stop the SYNACK timer.
*/
if (req) {
/* We no longer need the request sock. */
reqsk_fastopen_remove(sk, req, false);
tcp_rearm_rto(sk);
}
if (tp->snd_una != tp->write_seq)
break;
tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_FIN_WAIT2);
sk->sk_shutdown |= SEND_SHUTDOWN;
sk_dst_confirm(sk);
if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
/* Wake up lingering close() */
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
break;
}
if (tp->linger2 < 0) {
tcp_done(sk);
NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPABORTONDATA);
return 1;
}
if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq != TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq &&
after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - th->fin, tp->rcv_nxt)) {
/* Receive out of order FIN after close() */
if (tp->syn_fastopen && th->fin)
tcp_fastopen_active_disable(sk);
tcp_done(sk);
NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPABORTONDATA);
return 1;
}
tmo = tcp_fin_time(sk);
if (tmo > TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN) {
inet_csk_reset_keepalive_timer(sk, tmo - TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
} else if (th->fin || sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
/* Bad case. We could lose such FIN otherwise.
* It is not a big problem, but it looks confusing
* and not so rare event. We still can lose it now,
* if it spins in bh_lock_sock(), but it is really
* marginal case.
*/
inet_csk_reset_keepalive_timer(sk, tmo);
} else {
tcp_time_wait(sk, TCP_FIN_WAIT2, tmo);
goto discard;
}
break;
}
case TCP_CLOSING:
if (tp->snd_una == tp->write_seq) {
tcp_time_wait(sk, TCP_TIME_WAIT, 0);
goto discard;
}
break;
case TCP_LAST_ACK:
if (tp->snd_una == tp->write_seq) {
tcp_update_metrics(sk);
tcp_done(sk);
goto discard;
}
break;
}
/* step 6: check the URG bit */
tcp_urg(sk, skb, th);
/* step 7: process the segment text */
switch (sk->sk_state) {
case TCP_CLOSE_WAIT:
case TCP_CLOSING:
case TCP_LAST_ACK:
if (!before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tp->rcv_nxt))
break;
/* fall through */
case TCP_FIN_WAIT1:
case TCP_FIN_WAIT2:
/* RFC 793 says to queue data in these states,
* RFC 1122 says we MUST send a reset.
* BSD 4.4 also does reset.
*/
if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) {
if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq != TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq &&
after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - th->fin, tp->rcv_nxt)) {
NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPABORTONDATA);
tcp_reset(sk);
return 1;
}
}
/* Fall through */
case TCP_ESTABLISHED:
tcp_data_queue(sk, skb);
queued = 1;
break;
}
/* tcp_data could move socket to TIME-WAIT */
if (sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSE) {
tcp_data_snd_check(sk);
tcp_ack_snd_check(sk);
}
if (!queued) {
discard:
tcp_drop(sk, skb);
}
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_rcv_state_process);
当前客户端处于TCP_SYN_SENT状态，并调用tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process处理SYN_SENT状态下接收到的TCP段，发送ACK报文
到这里，三次握手期间tcp接收处理数据包的过程基本完成。
来源：https://www.cnblogs.com/yll333/p/12093603.html