问题
I'm trying to solve an equation system with a 3x3 matrix a and a right hand side b of arbitrary shape (3, ...). If b has one or two dimensions, numpy.linalg.solve does the trick. It breaks down for more dimensions though:
import numpy
a = numpy.random.rand(3, 3)
b = numpy.random.rand(3)
numpy.linalg.solve(a, b) # okay
b = numpy.random.rand(3, 4)
numpy.linalg.solve(a, b) # okay
b = numpy.random.rand(3, 4, 5)
numpy.linalg.solve(a, b) # ERR
ValueError: solve: Input operand 1 has a mismatch in its core
dimension 0, with gufunc signature (m,m),(m,n)->(m,n) (size 5 is
different from 3)
I would have expected an output array sol of shape (3, 4, 5) with the solution corresponding to the right-hand side b[:, i, j] is sol[:, i, j].
Any hint on how to best work around this?
回答1:
Temporarily reshape b to (3, 20), solve the linear system, and then reshape the resultant array to original shape of b (3, 4, 5):
In [34]: a = numpy.random.rand(3, 3)
In [35]: b = numpy.random.rand(3, 4, 5)
In [36]: x = numpy.linalg.solve(a, b.reshape(b.shape[0], -1)).reshape(b.shape)
OR
Swap the first axis of b with the second using np.swapaxes, solve the linear system, and then restore the axes:
In [58]: x = np.swapaxes(np.linalg.solve(a, np.swapaxes(b, 0, 1)), 0, 1)
Sanity Check:
In [38]: np.einsum('ij,jkl', a, x)
Out[38]:
array([[[ 0.44859955, 0.22967928, 0.74336067, 0.47440575, 0.53798895],
[ 0.80045696, 0.54138958, 0.89870834, 0.56862419, 0.28217437],
[ 0.02093982, 0.78534718, 0.77208236, 0.41568151, 0.95100661],
[ 0.03820421, 0.47067312, 0.71928294, 0.30852615, 0.64454321]],
[[ 0.31757072, 0.30527186, 0.36768759, 0.95869289, 0.86601996],
[ 0.60616508, 0.69927063, 0.53470332, 0.88906606, 0.76066344],
[ 0.95411847, 0.51116677, 0.29338398, 0.04418815, 0.96210206],
[ 0.23449429, 0.64159963, 0.7732404 , 0.4314741 , 0.81279619]],
[[ 0.6399571 , 0.57640652, 0.0186913 , 0.66304489, 0.83372239],
[ 0.28426522, 0.62367363, 0.37163699, 0.78217433, 0.90573787],
[ 0.91066088, 0.06699638, 0.43079394, 0.00263537, 0.399102 ],
[ 0.17711441, 0.48724858, 0.05526752, 0.34251648, 0.94059739]]])
In [39]: b
Out[39]:
array([[[ 0.44859955, 0.22967928, 0.74336067, 0.47440575, 0.53798895],
[ 0.80045696, 0.54138958, 0.89870834, 0.56862419, 0.28217437],
[ 0.02093982, 0.78534718, 0.77208236, 0.41568151, 0.95100661],
[ 0.03820421, 0.47067312, 0.71928294, 0.30852615, 0.64454321]],
[[ 0.31757072, 0.30527186, 0.36768759, 0.95869289, 0.86601996],
[ 0.60616508, 0.69927063, 0.53470332, 0.88906606, 0.76066344],
[ 0.95411847, 0.51116677, 0.29338398, 0.04418815, 0.96210206],
[ 0.23449429, 0.64159963, 0.7732404 , 0.4314741 , 0.81279619]],
[[ 0.6399571 , 0.57640652, 0.0186913 , 0.66304489, 0.83372239],
[ 0.28426522, 0.62367363, 0.37163699, 0.78217433, 0.90573787],
[ 0.91066088, 0.06699638, 0.43079394, 0.00263537, 0.399102 ],
[ 0.17711441, 0.48724858, 0.05526752, 0.34251648, 0.94059739]]])
Use np.allclose() so that you don't have to manually going through the numbers and check, particularly for large arrays:
In [32]: b_ = np.einsum('ij,jkl', a, x)
In [33]: np.allclose(b, b_)
Out[33]: True
回答2:
I'd like to add that the manual clearly states:
a : (..., M, M) array_like
Coefficient matrix.
b : {(..., M,), (..., M, K)}, array_like
Ordinate or “dependent variable” values.
So the before last dimension must be the same as the last two dimensions of a (M). Other than that it behaves as you expect - more dimensions are possible, returning a result with the same dimension as B. This way the solution of Ax=B is naturally calculated, and the dimensions automatically converted - just solving many systems of equations with solution of dimension (M,K), and embedding them in the outer dimensions. In your case having 3 at the beginning and not in the middle is confusing the algorithm. Example with 3 dimensions;
>>> a=np.random.rand(9).reshape(3,3)
>>> b=np.random.rand(12).reshape(2,3,2)
>>> np.linalg.solve(a,b)
array([[[-0.63673083, 0.57508091],
[ 0.87653408, 0.46092677],
[ 0.61128222, -0.19641607]],
[[-0.91645601, 1.30939652],
[ 0.83591936, -0.17006344],
[ 0.19086912, 0.29082206]]])
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48387261/numpy-linalg-solve-with-right-hand-side-of-more-than-three-dimensions