问题
I saw this line of code in a correction in a coding game
const tC = readline().split(' ').map(x => +x);
I wonder what it does because when I log this function it render the same thing that this one
const tC = readline().split(' ').map(x => x);
but the rest of the code didn't work
Context :
/** Temperatures (easy) https://www.codingame.com/training/easy/temperatures
* Solving this puzzle validates that the loop concept is understood and that
* you can compare a list of values.
* This puzzle is also a playground to experiment the concept of lambdas in
* different programming languages. It's also an opportunity to discover
* functional programming.
*
* Statement:
* Your program must analyze records of temperatures to find the closest to
* zero.
*
* Story:
* It's freezing cold out there! Will you be able to find the temperature
* closest to zero in a set of temperatures readings?
**/
const N = +readline();
const tC = readline().split(' ').map(x => +x);
let min = Infinity;
for (let i in tC) {
(Math.abs(tC[i]) < Math.abs(min) || tC[i] === -min && tC[i] > 0) && (min = tC[i]);
}
print(min || 0);
Thanks a lot
回答1:
According to this site below are the inputs the program should receive
Line 1: N, the number of temperatures to analyze
Line 2: A string with the N temperatures expressed as integers ranging from -273 to 5526
Let me provide line by line comments with respect to the game rules
// Line 1: reads number temperature inputs. + converts to number
const N = +readline();
// Line 2: reads string of temperatures.
// tC contains an array of temperatures of length N in numbers. + converts to number
const tC = readline().split(' ').map(x => +x);
let min = Infinity;
// iterate over tC array
for (let i in tC) {
// If two numbers are equally close to zero, positive integer has to be considered closest to zero
// set min = current iterating number if it matches above condition
(Math.abs(tC[i]) < Math.abs(min) || tC[i] === -min && tC[i] > 0) && (min = tC[i]);
}
print(min || 0);
Here is the working demo in javascript
modified to make it understandable for beginners.
// Line 1: reads number temperature inputs. + converts to number
// const N = +readline(); SAMPLE ALTERNATIVE
const N = +"5";
// Line 2: reads string of temperatures.
// tC contains an array of temperatures of length N in numbers. + converts to number
// const tC = readline().split(' ').map(x => +x); SAMPLE ALTERNATIVE
const tC = "1 -2 -8 4 5".split(' ').map(x => +x);
let min = Infinity;
// iterate over tC array
for (let i in tC) {
// If two numbers are equally close to zero, positive integer has to be considered closest to zero
// set min = current iterating number if it matches above condition
(Math.abs(tC[i]) < Math.abs(min) || tC[i] === -min && tC[i] > 0) && (min = tC[i]);
}
console.log(min || 0);
回答2:
The .map(x => +x)
converts all items in the array to a number. And returns a new array with those converted values.
If you change it to .map(x => x)
then the values are left untouched und you just create a copy of the original array. So the strings remain strings which will break the code if numbers are expected.
I personally would avoid the +x
syntax and use the more verbose Number(x)
, and write either .map(x => Number(x))
or .map(Number)
.
回答3:
function readLine(){
return "123456"
}
var result = readLine().split("").map(x => +x)
console.log(result)
readLine().split("")
// splits the string into an array as follows ["1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6"]
.map(x => +x)
// map method returns a new array which will take each item and gives a new array , here number changing from string to numbers as follows [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] since +x is used
// the above is written in es6, which can be re written in es5 as follows
readLine().split("").map(function(x) {
return +x
})
// Note
In es6 if we have a single thing to pass we can avoid the function(x) to x
also we can remove the {} [curly braces and return too]
{return +x}
to +x
ES2015
readLine().split("").map(function(x) {
return +x
})
ES2016
readLine().split("").map(x => +x);
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52702610/i-wonder-what-this-function-really-does-split-mapx-x