问题
I've been looking into the NoStepInto feature of Visual Studio. Andy Pennell's post How to Not Step Into Functions using the Visual C++ Debugger has been extremely helpful.
But as far as I can tell, in VS2008 the string name of the rule no longer has to be an integer, and no longer has any effect on the priority of the rule.
I have played around with the registry a bit and it seems to use the best match or maximal match (not sure what the correct expression is).
So if I have the following two rules
boost boost\:\:.*=NoStepInto
boost::shared_ptr boost\:\:shared_ptr.*=StepInto
it does step into shared pointers, which I assume is because the second rule is a more exact match.
Has anyone come across any information on anywhere confirming or refuting this? I can't seem to find any.
Thank you!
回答1:
I just tested this and things seem to work the way I expect them to:
20 boost\:\:.*=NoStepInto
30 boost\:\:shared_ptr.*=StepInto
Does not step me into any boost namespace functions, except for shared_ptr's.
Changing the priorities around to
10 boost\:\:shared_ptr.*=StepInto
20 boost\:\:.*=NoStepInto
Does not step me into any boost namespace functions at all.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1091835/what-is-the-priority-on-nostepinto-entries-in-vs2008