问题
Despite changing the License Test Response to NOT_LICENSED in the Publisher's Edit Profile page, I am still receiving in the "Market Licensing Example" a LICENSED response.
I didn't modify the "Market Licensing Example" in any way (except for the mandatory BASE64_PUBLIC_KEY and changing com.example to 'com.somethingelse' of course).
What am I missing and how do I get the response I set in my Publisher's account for testing purposes?
回答1:
Answering myself:
In the Server Response Codes table, it says:
LICENSED: The application is licensed to the user. The user has purchased the application or the application only exists as a draft.
OK, so the question now is: How, on earth, am I supposed to learn what I need to learn from the "Market Licensing Example" if it always returns LICENSED and I cannot really upload it other than draft???
This is catch 22!
回答2:
I can change and get a reliable response IF I use a device with the developer account as its main account (good thing I have a couple of devices lying around...) or if the account has been added as test accounts (wouldnt work all the time).
Otherwise it will always say licensed with a VT/GT? attached as an Extra with a max long as value.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6365118/market-licensing-example-always-getting-licensed