问题
I'm using the ConcurrentDictionary and ConcurrentQueue classes from .NET 4 in the following code.
Is this code thread-safe? If not, how can I make it thread-safe?
public class Page
{
    public string Name {get; set; }
}
public class PageQueue
{
    private ConcurrentDictionary<int, ConcurrentQueue<Page>> pages =
        new ConcurrentDictionary<int, ConcurrentQueue<Page>>();
    public void Add(int id, Page page)
    {
        if (!this.pages.ContainsKey(id))
            this.pages[id] = new ConcurrentQueue<Page>();
        this.pages[id].Enqueue(page);
    }
    public Page GetAndRemove(int id)
    {
        Page lp = null;
        if(this.pages.ContainsKey(id))
            this.pages[id].TryDequeue(out lp);
        return lp;
    }
}
Demo:
 public class Demo
 {
     public void RunAll()
     {
         for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
             Task.Factory.StartNew(() => Run());
     }
     public void Run()
     {
         PageQueue pq = new PageQueue();
         pq.Add(1, new Page());
         pq.GetAndRemove(1);
     }
 }
    回答1:
As @Femaref correctly pointed out, there are some flaws in your code. I suggest you take advantage of the many methods offered by ConcurrentDictionary<K,V> to make your code thread-safe without the need for lock statements:
public class PageQueue
{
    private ConcurrentDictionary<int, ConcurrentQueue<Page>> pages =
        new ConcurrentDictionary<int, ConcurrentQueue<Page>>();
    public void Enqueue(int id, Page page)
    {
        var queue = this.pages.GetOrAdd(id, _ => new ConcurrentQueue<Page>());
        queue.Enqueue(page);
    }
    public bool TryDequeue(int id, out Page page)
    {
        ConcurrentQueue<Page> queue;
        if (this.pages.TryGetValue(id, out queue))
        {
            return queue.TryDequeue(out page);
        }
        page = null;
        return false;
    }
}
    回答2:
You can (and probably will) run in to problems with these statements:
    if (!this.pages.ContainsKey(id))
        this.pages[id] = new ConcurrentQueue<Page>();
and
    if(this.pages.ContainsKey(id))
        this.pages[id].TryDequeue(out lp);
as the ConcurrentDictionary can be changed between the if-statement and the Assignment/Dequeue. Use a lock on a locking object for those parts of the code, like:
public class PageQueue
{
    private ConcurrentDictionary<int, ConcurrentQueue<Page>> pages = new ConcurrentDictionary<int, ConcurrentQueue<Page>>();
    private object locker = new object();
    public void Add(int id , Page page)
    {
        lock(locker)
        {
          if (!this.pages.ContainsKey(id))
              this.pages[id] = new ConcurrentQueue<Page>();
        }
        this.pages[id].Enqueue(page);
    }
    public Page GetAndRemove(int id)
    {
        Page lp = null;
        lock(locker)
        {
          if(this.pages.ContainsKey(id))
            this.pages[id].TryDequeue(out lp);
        }
        return lp;
    }
}
    来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3548079/is-this-combination-of-concurrentdictionary-and-concurrentqueue-thread-safe