问题
I have a model where there are two fields that can technically be null. The field names are :is_activated and :activated_at. :activated_at is only required if :is_activated is set to true. It does not need to be present if :is_activated is false. What's the appropriate way in Rails to set this validation directly into ActiveRecord?
回答1:
You can use a Proc on the :activated_at validator.
validates :activated_at, :presence, if: Proc.new { |a| a.is_activated? }
Recommended Reading:
- http://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_validations.html#using-a-proc-with-if-and-unless
- http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Validations/ClassMethods.html
Finally, you should consider renaming :is_activated to simply :activated. This is considered better practice in Rails. The is_ prefix is used in other languages for boolean attributes because their method names don't support a ? character. Ruby does, and Rails generates ___? methods on boolean attributes. Because of this it's better to just call the attribute :activated and check it with activated?.
回答2:
Non-Boolean Attributes.
If you're not using a Boolean attribute, like is_activated, and want to ensure that one attribute is present when another, non-Boolean attribute is present, you can simplify it:
validates :activated_at, presence: true, if: :activated_by?
activated_by? will return false when null and true otherwise.
回答3:
You could do something like this:
validates :activated_at, presence: true, if: :is_activated?
def is_activated?
self.is_activated
end
This will only validate :activated_at if the method is_activated? returns true.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13750436/rails-validating-a-field-is-present-only-if-another-is-present