问题
I've following class:
class A {
public:
// ctr and etc ...
A* clone(B* container);
};
Now, I've a vector<A*> availableObjs populated already. I want to call clone on each of those, so and insert cloned objects into a new container clonedObjs of type vector<A*>. I'm trying following - but it doesn't compile:
transform(availableObjs.begin(), availableObjs.end(), back_inserter(clonedObjs),
bind1st(mem_fun(&A::clone), container)); // container is of type B*
Is there a easy way out? I've a lot classed like A - so making each of those a functor is too much task.
回答1:
You need to use bind2nd instead of bind1st:
transform(availableObjs.begin(), availableObjs.end(), back_inserter(clonedObjs),
bind2nd(mem_fun(&A::clone), container)); // container is of type B*
The functor created by mem_fun(&A::clone) expects an A* as its first parameter. This is the normally implicitly specified instance on which the method is called. The first "real" parameter of A::clone is the second parameter of mem_fun(&A::clone) and therefore needs to be bound with bind2nd.
回答2:
If you use Boost.Bind it might look like this:
std::transform(
availableObjs.begin(), availableObjs.end(),
back_inserter(clonedObjs),
boost::bind<A*>(boost::mem_fn(&A::clone), _1, container) );
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762781/mem-fun-and-bind1st-problem