Why can the execve system call run “/bin/sh” without any argv arguments, but not “/bin/ls”?

醉酒当歌 提交于 2019-11-27 06:42:53

问题


I am confused with the syscall of __NR_execve. When I learn linux system call. The correct way that I know to use execve is like this:

char *sc[2]; 
sc[0]="/bin/sh"; 
sc[1]= NULL; 
execve(sc[0],sc,NULL); 

Then the function execve will call syscall() to get into system kernel with putting the arguments on Registers EAX, EBX, ECX and EDX. However, It still succeed if I use

execve("/bin/sh",NULL,NULL);

But if I replace "/bin/sh" with "/bin/ls",it fail with:

A NULL argv[0] was passed through an exec system call.

I wonder why "/bin/sh" can be executed successfully without enough parameters while "/bin/ls" fail?


回答1:


This is not a kernel issues, kernel will run filename arg of execve regardless of argv and envp are NULL or not, it is just a unix convention that argv[0] points to the program name.

And what's you saw is just normal, nothing is wrong. Because ls is part of GNU's coreutils, and all programs in the coreutils package call set_program_name to do some setup work, you can see in the source, it checks whether argv[0] if NULL, and it will call abort when it is. On the other hand, /bin/sh is apparently a program that does not belong to coreutils, and does not check against argv[0], that's why it run without the problem.

Refer to the source code:

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/tree/src/ls.c#n1285

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/lib/progname.c#n51



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36673765/why-can-the-execve-system-call-run-bin-sh-without-any-argv-arguments-but-not

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!