问题
My generic method needs to serialize the object passed to it, however just insisting that it implements ISerializable doesn't seem to work. For example, I have a struct returned from a web service (marked with SerializableAttribute) that serializes to xml just fine, but, as expected, the C# compiler complains.
Is there a way I can check the object is serializable before attempting to serialize it, or, better still, a way of using the where
keyword to check the object is suitable?
Here's my full method:
public static void Push<T>(string url, T message)
where T : ISerializable
{
string xml = SerializeMessage(message);
// Send the message to Amazon SQS
SendMessageRequest sendReq = new SendMessageRequest { QueueUrl = url, MessageBody = xml };
AmazonSQSClient client = new AmazonSQSClient(S3User, S3Pass);
client.SendMessage(sendReq);
}
And SerializeMessage:
private static string SerializeMessage<T>(T message)
{
XmlSerializer xmlSerializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(T));
using (StringWriter stringWriter = new StringWriter())
{
xmlSerializer.Serialize(stringWriter, message);
return stringWriter.ToString();
}
}
If this isn't possible, what's the best way to perform a check that an object is serializable at runtime?
回答1:
You can't do this totally via generic constraints, but you can do a couple things to help:
1) Put the new() constraint on the generic type (to enable the ability to deserialize and to ensure the XmlSerializer doesn't complain about a lack of default ctor):
where T : new()
2) On the first line of your method handling the serialization (or constructor or anywhere else you don't have to repeat it over and over), you can perform this check:
if( !typeof(T).IsSerializable && !(typeof(ISerializable).IsAssignableFrom(typeof(T)) ) )
throw new InvalidOperationException("A serializable Type is required");
Of course, there's still the possibility of runtime exceptions when trying to serialize a type, but this will cover the most obvious issues.
回答2:
I wrote a length blog article on this subject that you may find helpful. It mainly goes into binary serialization but the concepts are applicable to most any serialization format.
- http://blogs.msdn.com/jaredpar/archive/2009/03/31/is-it-serializable.aspx
The long and short of it is
- There is no way to add a reliable generic constraint
- The only way to check and see if an object was serializable is to serialize it and see if the operation succeeds
回答3:
The only way to know if an object is serializable is to try to serialize it.
In fact, you were asking how to tell if a type "is serializable", but the actual question will be with respect to objects. Some instances of a type may not be serializable even if the type is marked [Serializable]. For instance, what if the instance contains circular references?
回答4:
Instead of
XmlSerializer xmlSerializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(T));
try
XmlSerializer xmlSerializer = new XmlSerializer(message.GetType());
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/945495/how-can-i-add-a-type-constraint-to-include-anything-serializable-in-a-generic-me