问题
I just had a rather unpleasant experience in our production environment, causing OutOfMemoryErrors: heapspace..
I traced the issue to my use of ArrayList::new in a function.
To verify that this is actually performing worse than normal creation via a declared constructor (t -> new ArrayList<>()), I wrote the following small method:
public class TestMain {
public static void main(String[] args) {
boolean newMethod = false;
Map<Integer,List<Integer>> map = new HashMap<>();
int index = 0;
while(true){
if (newMethod) {
map.computeIfAbsent(index, ArrayList::new).add(index);
} else {
map.computeIfAbsent(index, i->new ArrayList<>()).add(index);
}
if (index++ % 100 == 0) {
System.out.println("Reached index "+index);
}
}
}
}
Running the method with newMethod=true; will cause the method to fail with OutOfMemoryError just after index hits 30k. With newMethod=false; the program does not fail, but keeps pounding away until killed (index easily reaches 1.5 milion).
Why does ArrayList::new create so many Object[] elements on the heap that it causes OutOfMemoryError so fast?
(By the way - it also happens when the collection type is HashSet.)
回答1:
In the first case (ArrayList::new) you are using the constructor which takes an initial capacity argument, in the second case you are not. A large initial capacity (index in your code) causes a large Object[] to be allocated, resulting in your OutOfMemoryErrors.
Here are the two constructors' current implementations:
public ArrayList(int initialCapacity) {
if (initialCapacity > 0) {
this.elementData = new Object[initialCapacity];
} else if (initialCapacity == 0) {
this.elementData = EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA;
} else {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Illegal Capacity: "+
initialCapacity);
}
}
public ArrayList() {
this.elementData = DEFAULTCAPACITY_EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA;
}
Something similar happens in HashSet, except the array is not allocated until add is called.
回答2:
The computeIfAbsent signature is the following:
V computeIfAbsent(K key, Function<? super K, ? extends V> mappingFunction)
So the mappingFunction is the function which receives one argument. In your case K = Integer and V = List<Integer>, so the signature becomes (omitting PECS):
Function<Integer, List<Integer>> mappingFunction
When you write ArrayList::new in the place where Function<Integer, List<Integer>> is necessary, compiler looks for the suitable constructor which is:
public ArrayList(int initialCapacity)
So essentially your code is equivalent to
map.computeIfAbsent(index, i->new ArrayList<>(i)).add(index);
And your keys are treated as initialCapacity values which leads to pre-allocation of arrays of ever increasing size, which, of course, quite fast leads to OutOfMemoryError.
In this particular case constructor references are not suitable. Use lambdas instead. Were the Supplier<? extends V> used in computeIfAbsent, then ArrayList::new would be appropriate.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35296734/horrendous-performance-large-heap-footprint-of-java-8-constructor-reference