Is there any mutex/semaphore mechanism in shell scripts?

喜欢而已 提交于 2019-12-17 15:54:32

问题


I'm looking for mutex/semaphore/concurrency mechanism in shell script. Consider following situation: Unless "a" user does not close the shared file, "b" user should not able to open/update it. I'm just wondering how to implement mutex, semaphore, critical sections, etc. in shell scripting.

Which is the easiest way to implement locking mechanism [file level] in shell scripting?


回答1:


See BashFAQ and ProcessManagment for discussions on file locking in Bash.

Tagging your question as shell (only) limits the number of people that can help you. You may want to add unix, ksh, bash.

There are numerous questions/answers on this topic posted here already on S.O.

I hope this helps.




回答2:


The BashFAQ noted by shellter has some good examples. The basic idea, which I'm moving here so the page is self-contained, is to use an operation that both tests and sets at the same time: mkdir

mkdir will fail if the directory exists and will make it if it does not. It's an atomic operation and you can use it like so to do a mutex in your shell script (from the above BashFAQ)

# Bourne
lockdir=/tmp/myscript.lock
if mkdir "$lockdir"
then    # directory did not exist, but was created successfully
    echo >&2 "successfully acquired lock: $lockdir"
    # continue script
else    # failed to create the directory, presumably because it already exists
  echo >&2 "cannot acquire lock, giving up on $lockdir"
  exit 0
fi

follow the link for more detail on cleanup and other items.




回答3:


You can use the flock utility to lock a file / use it as a mutex.

Example:

#!/bin/sh -eu
#advanced bash stuff not needed
: >> lock #create a file if it doesn't exist
{
flock 3 #lock file by filedescriptor

echo $$ working with lock
sleep 2
echo $$ done with lock

} 3<lock

Example usage:

./mx & ./mx & ./mx & #will run one at a time cuz of the lock

(

In reply to massimo's point:

If you don't want to hardcode a filedecriptor number (it should rarely be a problem if you aren't hardcoding 0, 1, or 2, but anyway), then in bash (but not in a POSIX only shell) you can have the system pick a fd for you with:

{
flock $fd
#...
} {fd}<lock

)



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6870221/is-there-any-mutex-semaphore-mechanism-in-shell-scripts

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!