Is there any difference between “Object[] x” and “Object x[]”?

问题

I was updating a legacy code base in Java and I found a line like this:

Object arg[] = { new Integer(20), new Integer(22) };

That line catched my attention because I am used to this kind of code:

Object[] arg = { new Integer(20), new Integer(22) };

The content of the array isn't important here. I'm curious about the brackets next to the variable name versus the brackets next to the class name. I tried in Eclipse (with Java 5) and both lines are valid for the compiler.

Is there any difference between those declarations?

回答1:

Both are legal and both work. But placing [] before the array's name is recommended.

From Javadocs:

You can also place the square brackets after the array's name:

float anArrayOfFloats[]; // this form is discouraged

However, convention discourages this form; the brackets identify the array type and should appear with the type designation.

回答2:

No, they both work. But watch out:

float anArrayOfFloats[], aSecondVariable;

will declare one array of floats and one float, while:

float[] anArrayOfFloats, aSecondVariable;

will declare two arrays of floats.

回答3:

There is no difference. Both are legal.

You can read in Java Language Specification http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/arrays.doc.html

The [] may appear as part of the type at the beginning of the declaration, or as part of the declarator for a particular variable, or both, as in this example:

byte[] rowvector, colvector, matrix[];

回答4:

Another good reason to write Integer[] ints instead of Integer ints[] is because of inheritance relations: Integer[] is subtype of Number[] is subtype of Object[].

In other words, you can put Integers in an Object array, so you can think of the [] as part of the object's type definition -- which is why it makes sense to have it close to the type instead of the object name.

回答5:

Short answer: No.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2229602/is-there-any-difference-between-object-x-and-object-x