问题
I'm implementing some data structures, each supporting a set of commands such as INSERT value.
I've used a tokenizer to generate a vector that holds each word/value.
I want to be able to output to a .txt file the time every function call took, plus what the function returned if it does return something.
For example, if the command is INSERT AVLTREE 4, I want to just output the time calling avl.insert(4) took.
If the command is SEARCH AVLTREE 4, I want to output the time calling avl.search(4) took, as well as its result (e.g. "SUCCESS" or "FAILURE").
There are probably many things wrong with the following code, but here's what I came up with:
I made two files (.cpp/.hpp) which contain the following self-hacked function wrapper, and also a variant as well as a struct:
// WRAPPER CPP
// file: wrap.cpp
#include "wrap.hpp"
#include <chrono>
#include <string>
#include <utility>
#include <boost/variant.hpp>
using std::chrono::high_resolution_clock;
using std::chrono::time_point;
using std::chrono::nanoseconds;
using std::string;
using std::to_string;
using std::forward;
using boost::get;
using boost::static_visitor;
using boost::apply_visitor;
// I'm overloading std::to_string, so it works on std::strings as well.
string to_string(const string &value)
{
return value;
}
// I want to apply to_string on whatever is inside my variant.
class to_string_visitor : public static_visitor<>
{
public:
template <typename T>
void operator()(T & operand) const
{
to_string(operand);
}
};
// Takes two points in time and returns the time
// between them in nanoseconds.
const nanoseconds::rep duration(const nanoseconds tpoints_difference) noexcept
{
const auto result = tpoints_difference.count();
return result;
}
// Generates a point in time.
const high_resolution_clock::time_point timeNow(void) noexcept
{
const auto result = high_resolution_clock::now();
return result;
}
// Here's where's the problematic magic happens:
// The ret boolean is set to true if the function F returns a value,
// otherwise, it is set to false.
//
// Variadic arguments are being taken and then std::forwarded to F.
template<typename F, typename... Args>
const output wrapper(bool ret, F function, Args&&... args) noexcept
{
// Generate a point in time, t1.
const high_resolution_clock::time_point t1 = timeNow();
// If F returns a result,
if (ret == true)
{
// assign it to result (my variant).
result = function(forward<Args>(args)...);
}
else
{
// just call F with Args forwarded.
function(forward<Args>(args)...);
}
// Generate another point in time, t2 and
// count the difference between t2 - t1.
const auto elapsed = duration(timeNow() - t1);
// Make whatever is inside result a string
// using std::to_string.
apply_visitor(to_string_visitor(), result);
// My struct
output out;
// which contains the time elapsed and
// the result returned
out.time = elapsed;
out.result = get<string>(result);
// I can theoretically use both time elapsed and
// result returned however I want. Hooray!..almost:(
return out;
}
Here is the variant result:
// These are all the types a data structure function may return.
variant<int, unsigned, uint32_t, size_t, graph_size, string> result = 0;
graph_size, just for reference:
struct graph_size
{
unsigned vertices; //Number of vertices that the Graph currently contains
unsigned edges; //Number of edges that the Graph currently contains
};
And, finally, the output struct:
typedef struct output
{
double time; // function call time
string result; // what function returned
// notice that if function returned nothing,
// result will be an empty string.
output() : time(0), result("") {}
} output;
I'm trying to use wrapper like so:
AVL avl;
// stuff
auto out = wrapper(true, avl.insert, 4);
I get the following error:
invalid use of non-static member function 'void AVL::insert(int)'
And here's a bonus one which should hint me towards what I botched but just can't quite grasp it:
no matching function for call to 'wrapper(bool, <unresolved overloaded function type>, unsigned int&)'
Any thoughts?
I appreciate all time spent in advance :)
EDIT 1: The question title may not be very suitable, I'll merrily change if you have something good in mind
回答1:
As you need different behaviour depending of return type, you might use specialization/SFINAE, something like:
template<typename F, typename... Args>
auto wrapper(F function, Args&&... args) noexcept
-> std::enable_if_t<std::is_same<void, std::invoke_result_t<F, Args&&...>>::value, output>
{
const high_resolution_clock::time_point t1 = timeNow();
function(forward<Args>(args)...);
const auto elapsed = duration(timeNow() - t1);
output out;
out.time = elapsed;
out.result = ""; // void return
return out;
}
template<typename F, typename... Args>
auto wrapper(F function, Args&&... args) noexcept
-> std::enable_if_t<!std::is_same<void, std::invoke_result_t<F, Args&&...>>::value, output>
{
const high_resolution_clock::time_point t1 = timeNow();
auto result = function(forward<Args>(args)...);
const auto elapsed = duration(timeNow() - t1);
output out;
out.time = elapsed;
out.result = to_string(result);
return out;
}
with possible usage:
AVL avl;
auto out = wrapper([&](){ return avl.insert(4);});
回答2:
The problem lies in a corner case of your wrapper() function usage. It's quite tricky to make it work with member functions and possibly with void-returning functions (see Jarod42's excellent answer on that). This:
wrapper(true, avl.insert, 4);
will not compile for several reasons. Not only avl.insert is invalid, but even if you tried to pass a member function by a pointer and pass an object to call it, like so:
wrapper(true, &AVL::insert, avl, 4);
it still won't compile, but now due to how you invoke it inside wrapper.
The workaround is to use a suitable tool for this kind of job - std::invoke. It correctly handles free functions, member functions etc. Example usage:
#include <iostream>
#include <functional>
struct foo {
void bar(int x) {
std::cout << x;
}
};
template <typename F, typename... Args>
void wrapper(F f, Args&&... args) {
std::invoke(f, std::forward<Args>(args)...);
}
void free_bar() {
std::cout << "free";
}
int main() {
foo f;
wrapper(&foo::bar, f, 1); // pass a pointer to member function and the instance itself, then arguments
wrapper(free_bar);
}
Notice how the code correctly handles each case. std::invoke just does the right thing.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56685232/problems-trying-to-construct-a-wrapper-measuring-function-call-time