问题
I have a bunch of domain objects that I serialize, send to other applications and then deserialize using Json.Net
. These objects may have properties that are
- Defined as an abstract base class with multiple derived classes
- Dynamic Properties
I've used TypeNameHandling.Auto
, which adds the $type
property to types that differ from the declared type. However, this setting has an unwanted side effect on my dynamic properties, namely that the types of them gets declared, too.
In the example below model
is a dynamic property defined as public dynamic Model { get; set; }
in my C# code.
"model":{"$type":"<>f__AnonymousType0`3[[System.String, mscorlib],[System.String, mscorlib],[System.String, mscorlib]], ExampleAssembly","link":"http://www.google.com","name":"John"}
When trying to deserialize this string in another assembly, Json.Net can't (of course) find the ExampleAssembly
. Using the TypeNameHandling.None
property gives the following property serialization
"model": {"link":"http://www.google.com","name":"John"}
Which can be successfully deserialized to a dynamic
. However, this breaks deserialization of derived types.
Any ideas on how to get this to work without implementing custom IContractResolver
and possibly other custom code?
I don't own the domain objects, so I can't decorate them or their properties with attributes or allow them to implement interfaces etc. What I'm looking for is some sort of setting in the serializer that omits types for dynamics
.
IMHO this should be configurable through settings somehow, I just havn't found it.
回答1:
Json.Net does not provide a specific setting to turn off type name handling for dynamic types only. If you can't (or don't want to) mark the relevant dynamic properties with [JsonProperty(TypeNameHandling = TypeNameHandling.None)]
, then your only other option (short of modifying the Json.Net source code itself) is to implement a custom contract resolver to apply the behavior programmatically. But don't worry, this is not difficult to do if you derive your resolver from one of the Json.Net-provided resolvers such as DefaultContractResolver
or CamelCasePropertyNamesContractResolver
.
Here is all the code you would need:
using System;
using System.Reflection;
using Newtonsoft.Json;
using Newtonsoft.Json.Serialization;
public class OmitTypeNamesOnDynamicsResolver : DefaultContractResolver
{
public static readonly OmitTypeNamesOnDynamicsResolver Instance = new OmitTypeNamesOnDynamicsResolver();
protected override JsonProperty CreateProperty(MemberInfo member, MemberSerialization memberSerialization)
{
JsonProperty prop = base.CreateProperty(member, memberSerialization);
if (member.GetCustomAttribute<System.Runtime.CompilerServices.DynamicAttribute>() != null)
{
prop.TypeNameHandling = TypeNameHandling.None;
}
return prop;
}
}
Then, just add the resolver to the JsonSerializerSettings
and you should be all set.
JsonSerializerSettings settings = new JsonSerializerSettings
{
TypeNameHandling = TypeNameHandling.Auto,
ContractResolver = OmitTypeNamesOnDynamicsResolver.Instance
};
string json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(foo, settings);
Here is a round-trip demo to prove the concept:
public class Program
{
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
Foo foo = new Foo
{
Model = new { link = "http://www.google.com", name = "John" },
Widget1 = new Doodad { Name = "Sprocket", Size = 10 },
Widget2 = new Thingy { Name = "Coil", Strength = 5 }
};
JsonSerializerSettings settings = new JsonSerializerSettings
{
TypeNameHandling = TypeNameHandling.Auto,
ContractResolver = OmitTypeNamesOnDynamicsResolver.Instance,
Formatting = Formatting.Indented
};
string json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(foo, settings);
Console.WriteLine(json);
Console.WriteLine();
Foo foo2 = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Foo>(json, settings);
Console.WriteLine(foo2.Model.link);
Console.WriteLine(foo2.Model.name);
Console.WriteLine(foo2.Widget1.Name + " (" + foo2.Widget1.GetType().Name + ")");
Console.WriteLine(foo2.Widget2.Name + " (" + foo2.Widget2.GetType().Name + ")");
}
}
public class Foo
{
public dynamic Model { get; set; }
public AbstractWidget Widget1 { get; set; }
public AbstractWidget Widget2 { get; set; }
}
public class AbstractWidget
{
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class Thingy : AbstractWidget
{
public int Strength { get; set; }
}
public class Doodad : AbstractWidget
{
public int Size { get; set; }
}
Output:
{
"Model": {
"link": "http://www.google.com",
"name": "John"
},
"Widget1": {
"$type": "Doodad, JsonTest",
"Size": 10,
"Name": "Sprocket"
},
"Widget2": {
"$type": "Thingy, JsonTest",
"Strength": 5,
"Name": "Coil"
}
}
http://www.google.com
John
Sprocket (Doodad)
Coil (Thingy)
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39386197/omit-type-for-dynamic-property-without-modifying-class