问题
I want to write an extension method (e.g. .IsEmpty()) for both ICollection and IReadonlyCollection interfaces:
public static bool IsEmpty<T>(this IReadOnlyCollection<T> collection)
{
return collection == null || collection.Count == 0;
}
public static bool IsEmpty<T>(this ICollection<T> collection)
{
return collection == null || collection.Count == 0;
}
But when I use it with classes implemeting both interfaces, I obviously get the ‘ambiguous invocation’.
I don't want to type myList.IsEmpty<IReadOnlyCollection<myType>>(), I want it to be just myList.IsEmpty().
Is this possible?
回答1:
Given that they both inherit from IEnumerable<T> you could avoid the ambiguity issue by doing an extension on that instead:
public static class IEnumerableExtensions
{
public static bool IsEmpty<T>(this IEnumerable<T> enumerable)
{
return enumerable == null || !enumerable.Any();
}
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18627958/extension-methods-for-both-icollection-and-ireadonlycollection