问题
I'm attempting to test a class with a number of private classes (yes, I know this is generally considered poor practice for testability, but this question is not in regards to design principles). My class would look something like this:
public class EnclosingClass {
.
.
.
private class InnerClass implements InnerClassType {
public InnerClass(){ /* do stuff */}
public int InnerClassMethod();
}
}
InnerClassType
is a public interface
I've tried instantiating the classes with powermock by doing:
Class clazz = Whitebox.getInnerClassType(EnclosingClass.class, "InnerClass");
Constructor constructor = Whitebox.getConstructor(clazz, null);
InnerClassType innerClass = (InnerClassType) constructor.newInstance(null);
and also:
Class clazz = Whitebox.getInnerClassType(EnclosingClass.class, "InnerClass");
InnerClassType innerClass = (InnerClassType) Whitebox.invokeConstructor(clazz);
However, on both attempts I get a ConstructorNotFoundException
Is it possible to instantiate these inner classes? If so, where am I going wrong?
回答1:
You should be able to move past your ConstructorNotFoundExeception via the following mods to your first effort:
Class clazz = Whitebox.getInnerClassType(EnclosingClass.class, "InnerClass");
Constructor constructor = Whitebox.getConstructor(clazz, EnclosingClass.class);
InnerClassType innerClass = (InnerClassType) constructor.newInstance(new EnclosingClass());
Since your inner class is not static, it implicitly expects a "this" reference from the outer class. Using this method, looks like you have to get explicit with it.
回答2:
You can mock it like this:
InnerClassType innerClass = (InnerClassType) Mockito.mock(
Class.forName(EnclosingClass.class.getName() + "$InnerClass")
);
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13201943/can-powermock-instantiate-an-inner-class-for-test-cases