问题
I've extended the ByteArray class, like this:
[RemoteClass(alias="MyByteArray")]
public class MyByteArray extends ByteArray {}
and cloned an instance of this class using ByteArray#readObject()/writeObject(). However, for some reason, the cloned object is an instance of ByteArray rather than MyByteArray. This is illustrated in the following example:
registerClassAlias("MyByteArray", MyByteArray);
var b1:MyByteArray = new MyByteArray();
var tmp:ByteArray = new ByteArray();
tmp.writeObject(b1);
tmp.position = 0;
var b2:* = tmp.readObject();
trace( b2 is MyByteArray ); // prints false
trace( b2 is ByteArray ); // prints true
Moreover, when I add some custom fields in MyByteArray class, they aren't saved with writeObject() and neither cloned...
Can anybody explain me why the cloned object is not an instance of MyByteArray?
Thanks a lot!
回答1:
I think this is because tmp is of type ByteArray, not of type MyByteArray. If you make tmp of type MyByteArray, it should return an object of the same type, using writeObject i think? Or you may need to typecast it.
回答2:
ByteArray is likely handled as a special case for object serialisation, so I doubt you'll get around it.
Attempting to subclass ByteArray sounds like a code smell to me. I'd look at using encapsulation rather than inheritance to solve your problem.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/875163/trouble-cloning-an-extended-bytearray