Activator vs sbt

问题

I upgraded from Play 2.1.1 to Play 2.3.2.

Now Typesafe has "Activator", which combines the several offerings of their platform.

I installed the "minimal" form of it, which is supposed to download features only as needed.

Then I thought, "Hey, isn't that the point of a build and dependency management tools like, I don't know, SBT?"

I found that I could just go to my Play project and run

sbt

Does this do something significantly different than running

activator

---

(If I could just use SBT, I'd prefer that, since it has a Debian package, which IMO is easier to manage.)

回答1:

see here -- the activator-launch.jar file is the sbt launcher with an embedded properties file.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25101066/activator-vs-sbt