问题
I am currently learning Hibernate and the Java Persistence API.
I have an @Entity class, and need to apply annotations to the various fields. I have included in the code below all three places where they could go.
Should I apply them to the field itself, the getter or the setter? And what is the semantic difference, if any, between these three options.
import javax.persistence.Entity;
import javax.persistence.Table;
import javax.persistence.Id;
@Entity
@Table(name = "song")
public class Song {
// Annotations should only be applied to one of the below
@Id
@Column(name="id", unique=true, nullable=false)
private int id;
@Id
@Column(name="id", unique=true, nullable=false)
public int getId() {
return id;
}
@Id
@Column(name="id", unique=true, nullable=false)
public void setId(int id) {
this.id = id;
}
}
回答1:
You have to choose between field and getter. Annotations on setters are not supported. And all the annotations should be on fields, or they should all be on getters: you can't mix both approaches (except if you use the @AccessType annotation).
Regarding which one is preferrale, the answer is: it depends. I prefer field access, but YMMV, and there are situations where property access is preferrable. See Hibernate Annotations - Which is better, field or property access?.
回答2:
You have to put annotations only for field or only for getter
@Id
@Column(name="id", unique=true, nullable=false)
private int id;
public int getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(int id) {
this.id = id;
}
or
private int id;
@Id
@Column(name="id", unique=true, nullable=false)
public int getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(int id) {
this.id = id;
}
And for all fields/properties in same way. All annotations for fields or all annotations for getter
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8965116/javax-persistence-annotations-on-field-getter-or-setter