问题
When I try to override the magic method __eq__, and use super to access the base method found in object, I get an error. There's no way this is a bug, but it sure feels like one:
class A(object):
def __eq__(self, other):
return super(A, self).__eq__(other)
A() == 0
# raises AttributeError: 'super' object has no attribute '__eq__'
This is unintuitive because object.__eq__ exists, but for class A(object): pass it doesn't. If I'm not mistaken __eq__ resorts to an is check, so that may be the workaround here, but using is instead of super isn't mixin friendly. Going that route is ok in my case, but in others it might not be.
Any suggestions, or info on why __eq__ works this way would be great.
回答1:
As noted in Will's answer, object() does not actually implement __eq__ at all for instances (in python 2.7).
You are being deceived by the fact that object.__eq__ exists into believing it must be a method that checks if instances of object are equal
Instead, object.__eq__ is actually a class method, inherited from type, that is used to check if types are equal.
That is, to handle expressions such as object == int and object == object.
回答2:
This is because object() doesn't actually implement an __eq__(). The "default" here would be:
class A(object):
def __eq__(self, other):
if self is other:
return True
return self == other
But, if what you're attempting had worked, you would actually be checking whether the self instance of the parent class equaled other. And, it's the same object (self), so it would. So the closest equivalent of your code would actually be:
class A(object):
def __eq__(self, other):
if self is other:
return True
return super(A, self) == other
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37381318/super-object-has-no-attribute-eq