Running bash commands in the background without printing job and process ids

别等时光非礼了梦想. 提交于 2019-11-27 00:31:30

问题


To run a process in the background in bash is fairly easy.

$ echo "Hello I'm a background task" &
[1] 2076
Hello I'm a background task
[1]+  Done                    echo "Hello I'm a background task"

However the output is verbose. On the first line is printed the job id and process id of the background task, then we have the output of the command, finally we have the job id, its status and the command which triggered the job.

Is there a way to suppress the output of running a background task such that the output looks exactly as it would without the ampersand at the end? I.e:

$ echo "Hello I'm a background task" &
Hello I'm a background task

The reason I ask is that I want to run a background process as part of a tab-completion command so the output of that command must be uninterrupted to make any sense.


回答1:


Not related to completion, but you could supress that output by putting the call in a subshell:

(echo "Hello I'm a background task" &)



回答2:


In some newer versions of bash and in ksh93 you can surround it with a sub-shell or process group (i.e. { ... }).

/home/shellter $ { echo "Hello I'm a background task" & } 2>/dev/null
Hello I'm a background task
/home/shellter $



回答3:


Building off of @shellter's answer, this worked for me:

tyler@Tyler-Linux:~$ { echo "Hello I'm a background task" & disown; } 2>/dev/null; sleep .1;
Hello I'm a background task
tyler@Tyler-Linux:~$

I don't know the reasoning behind this, but I remembered from an old post that disown prevents bash from outputting the process ids.




回答4:


Building on the above answer, if you need to allow stderr to come through from the command:

f() { echo "Hello I'm a background task" >&2; }
{ f 2>&3 &} 3>&2 2>/dev/null



回答5:


Based on this answer, I came up with the more concise and correct:

silent_background() {
    { 2>&3 "$@"& } 3>&2 2>/dev/null
    disown &>/dev/null  # Prevent whine if job has already completed
}
silent_background date



回答6:


Try:

user@host:~$ read < <( echo "Hello I'm a background task" & echo $! )
user@host:~$ echo $REPLY
28677

And you have hidden both the output and the PID. Note that you can still retrieve the PID from $REPLY




回答7:


Sorry for the response to an old post, but I figure this is useful to others, and it's the first response on Google.

I was having an issue with this method (subshells) and using 'wait'. However, as I was running it inside a function, I was able to do this:

function a {
    echo "I'm background task $1"
    sleep 5
}

function b {
    for i in {1..10}; do
        a $i &
    done
    wait
} 2>/dev/null

And when I run it:

$ b
I'm background task 1
I'm background task 3
I'm background task 2
I'm background task 4
I'm background task 6
I'm background task 7
I'm background task 5
I'm background task 9
I'm background task 8
I'm background task 10

And there's a delay of 5 seconds before I get my prompt back.




回答8:


The subshell solution works, but I also wanted to be able to wait on the background jobs (and not have the "Done" message at the end). $! from a subshell is not "waitable" in the current interactive shell. The only solution that worked for me was to use my own wait function, which is very simple:

myWait() {
  while true; do
    sleep 1; STOP=1
    for p in $*; do
      ps -p $p >/dev/null && STOP=0 && break
    done
    ((STOP==1)) && return 0
  done
}

i=0
((i++)); p[$i]=$(do_whatever1 & echo $!)
((i++)); p[$i]=$(do_whatever2 & echo $!)
..
myWait ${p[*]}

Easy enough.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7686989/running-bash-commands-in-the-background-without-printing-job-and-process-ids

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!