How do I use COMMTIMEOUTS to wait until bytes are available but read more than one byte?

问题

I have a C++ serial port class that has a none blocking and a blocking mode for read operations. For blocking mode:

COMMTIMEOUTS cto;
GetCommTimeouts(m_hFile,&cto);
// Set the new timeouts
cto.ReadIntervalTimeout = 0;
cto.ReadTotalTimeoutConstant = 0;
cto.ReadTotalTimeoutMultiplier = 0;
SetCommTimeouts(m_hFile,&cto)

For non blocking mode:

COMMTIMEOUTS cto;
GetCommTimeouts(m_hFile,&cto);
// Set the new timeouts
cto.ReadIntervalTimeout = MAXDWORD;
cto.ReadTotalTimeoutConstant = 0;
cto.ReadTotalTimeoutMultiplier = 0;
SetCommTimeouts(m_hFile,&cto)

I would like to add another mode that waits for any number of bytes and read them.

From MSDN COMMTIMEOUTS structure:

If an application sets ReadIntervalTimeout and ReadTotalTimeoutMultiplier to MAXDWORD and sets ReadTotalTimeoutConstant to a value greater than zero and less than MAXDWORD, one of the following occurs when the ReadFile function is called:

If there are any bytes in the input buffer, ReadFile returns immediately with the bytes in the buffer.
If there are no bytes in the input buffer, ReadFile waits until a byte arrives and then returns immediately.
If no bytes arrive within the time specified by ReadTotalTimeoutConstant, ReadFile times out.

This looks in code like this:

COMMTIMEOUTS cto;
GetCommTimeouts(m_hFile,&cto);
// Set the new timeouts
cto.ReadIntervalTimeout = 100;
cto.ReadTotalTimeoutConstant = MAXDWORD;
cto.ReadTotalTimeoutMultiplier = MAXDWORD;
SetCommTimeouts(m_hFile,&cto)

But this returns emidiately on the first byte. This is a problem since I am reading the port in a loop and the handling of a byte is so fast that the next time I read the port, only another byte is available. The end result is that I am reading one byte at a time in a loop and using 100% of the core running that thread.

I would like to use the cto.ReadIntervalTimeout like in the MSDN documentation but still wait until at least one byte is available. Does anyone have an idea?

Thanks.

回答1:

The behavior you want will come from:

cto.ReadIntervalTimeout = 10;
cto.ReadTotalTimeoutConstant = 0;
cto.ReadTotalTimeoutMultiplier = 0;

It blocks arbitrarily long for the first byte (total timeout is disabled by setting the latter two fields to zero, per the documentation), then reads up to the buffer size as long as data is streaming in. If there's a 10ms gap in the data, it will return with what has been received so far.

回答2:

If you're using 100% (or even close to it) of the CPU, it sounds like you're doing something wrong elsewhere. As I showed in a previous answer, for years I've used code with the timeouts all set to 1. I initially set it that way just as a wild guess at something that might at least sort of work, with the intent of tuning it later. It's worked well enough that I've never gotten around to tuning it at all. Just for example, it'll read input from my GPS (about the only thing I have that even imitates using a serial port any more) using an almost immeasurably tiny amount of CPU time -- after hours of reading a constant stream of data from the GPS, it still shows 0:00:00 seconds of CPU time used (and I can't see any difference in CPU usage whether it's running or not).

Now, I'll certainly grant that a GPS isn't (even close to) the fastest serial device around, but we're still talking about ~100% vs. ~0%. That's clearly a pretty serious difference.

回答3:

if (dwEvtMask == EV_RXCHAR )
{
   Sleep(1);
   if (dwLength > 2)
    {
      Sleep(1);
      Readfile( m_Serial->m_hCom, data,dwLength, &dwBytesRead, &Overlapped);
      pDlg->PostMessage(WM_RECEIVE,0,0);
    }
}

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10390151/how-do-i-use-commtimeouts-to-wait-until-bytes-are-available-but-read-more-than-o

标签

c++

winapi

serial-port

communication