问题
I use a XmlSerializer to serialize/deserialize some objects. The problem is the performance. When profiling, using the XmlSerializer make our application 2 seconds longer to start. We cache our XmlSerializer and reuse them. We cannot use sgen.exe because we are creating the XmlSerializer with XmlAttributeOverrides.
I try to use serialization alternative like Json.Net and, at first, it's work great. The problem is that we need to be backward compatible so all the xml already generated need to be parsed correctly. Also, the object serialization output must be Xml.
To summarize:
- I receive Xml data serialized by a XmlSerializer.
- I need to deserialize the Xml data and convert it into an object.
- I need to serialize object into Xml (ideally an Xml format like the one a XmlSerializer would have done)
回答1:
Ultimately, it depends on the complexity of your model. XmlSerializer needs to do a lot of thinking, and the fact that it is taking so long leads me to suspect that your model is pretty complex. For a simple model, it might be possible to manually implement the deserialization using LINQ-to-XML (pretty easy), or maybe even XmlReader (if you are feeling very brave - it isn't easy to get 100% correct).
However, if the model is complex, this is a problem and frankly would be very risky in terms of introducing subtle bugs.
Another option is DataContractSerializer which handles xml, but not as well as XmlSerializer, and certainly not with as much control over the layout. I strongly suspect that DataContractSerializer would not help you.
There is no direct replacement for XmlSerializer that I am aware of, and if sgen.exe isn't an option I believe you basically have options:
- live with it
- rewrite
XmlSerializeryourself, somehow doing better than them - use something like LINQ-to-XML and accept the effort involved
Long term, I'd say "switch formats", and use xml for legacy import only. I happen to know of some very fast binary protocols that would be pretty easy to substitute in ;p
回答2:
The problem is that you are requesting types which are not covered by sgen which results in the generation of new assemblies during startup.
You could try to get your hands on the temp files generated by Xmlserializer for your specific types and use this code for your own pregnerated xmlserializer assembly. I have used this approach to find out why csc.exe was executed which did delay startup of my application.
Besides this it might help to rename some types like in the article to arrive at the same type names that sgen is creating to be able to use sgen. Usually type arrays are not precreated by sgen which is a pitty sometimes. But if you name your class ArrayOf HereGoesYourTypeName then you will be able to use the pregenerated assemblies.
回答3:
you have to Deserialize your list using a classic .net Serialization
something like the below:
TextReader tr = new StreamReader("yourlist.xml");
XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(List<YourObject>));
List<YourObject> myCutomList = (List<YourObject>)serializer.Deserialize(tr);
tr.Close();
then you can use the Json.Serialization
JavaScriptSerializer json = new JavaScriptSerializer();
JsonResult output = json.Serialize(myCutomList );
回答4:
If you have xml stored in the format that you cannot use then use xslt to transform it to the format that you can use.
If this xml is stored in the XmlSerializer format - lets say in flat files - or a db - then you can run your transforms over it once and not incur the XmlSerializer overhead at your usual runtime.
Alternatively you could xslt it at run time - but I doubt that this would be faster than the method outlined by Massimiliano.
回答5:
This answer has some good info on why XmlSerializer runs slow with XmlAttributeOverrides.
Do you really need to use the XmlSerializer in your main thread at startup?
Maybe run it in a background thread; If only some parts of the data are mandatory for startup perhaps you could manually read them into proxy/sparse versions of the real classes while the XmlSerializer initializes.
If its a GUI app you could just add a splash screen to hide the delay (or a game of tetris!!)
If all else fails can't you convert the existing files to JSON by just running the existing deserialize and a JSON serialize, or is there a hard requirement to keep them XML?
回答6:
You can use threading or tasks to get the application to startup faster and don't wait for the hardrive or the deserialization.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9502356/improve-performance-of-xmlserializer