问题
My purpose of using LAPACK is to calculate the cholesky of a matrix. I am programming in C/C++ in Fedora, but I am confused over which lapack to install - LAPACK with lapacke or clapack?
回答1:
The basic difference between the two is the need for a Fortran compiler.
CLAPACK is basically just the reference NETLIB LAPACK routines passed through the old f2c converter, allowing the library to be compiled with a C compiler.
LAPACKE is an attempt (started by Intel IIRC) to define a formal C language interface for Fortran LAPACK libraries. It has the advantage that it is LAPACK implementation independent and will hide toolchain specific C to Fortran interoperability so that the programmer doesn't have to worry about them. LAPACKE also has the distinct advantage of working correctly with the C99 complex intrinsic type.
I would not expect a major performance difference between the two (the choice of BLAS dictates most of that), but I would probably favor LAPACKE + the LAPACK and BLAS implmementation of choice, if I were to start from scratch today.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6567849/lapacke-or-clapack-if-programming-in-c-c-in-linux