问题
I don't know how to phrase the question very well in a short subject line, so let me try a longer explanation. Suppose I have these exception classes:
class ExceptionTypeA : public std::runtime_error
{
    // stuff
};
class ExceptionTypeB : public std::runtime_error
{
    // stuff
    operator ExceptionTypeA() const; // conversion operator to ExceptionTypeA
};
Can I then do this, and have it trigger the catch block?
try
{
    throw ExceptionTypeB();
}
catch (ExceptionTypeA& a)
{
    // will this be triggered?
}
I'm going to guess that it will not, which is unfortunate, but I thought I'd ask, since I couldn't find any info on it on the net or on SO. And yes, I realize I could just run the program in my compiler and see what happens, but that wouldn't tell me what the standard says about this behavior, just what my compiler implements (and I don't trust it).
回答1:
You cannot. Standardese at 15.3/3:
A handler is a match for an exception object of type E if
- The handler is of type
 cv Torcv T&and E and T are the same type (ignoring the top-level cv- qualifiers), or- the handler is of type
 cv Torcv T&and T is an unambiguous public base class of E, or- the handler is of type
 cv1 T* cv2and E is a pointer type that can be converted to the type of the handler by either or both of
- a standard pointer conversion (4.10) not involving conversions to pointers to private or protected or ambiguous classes
 - a qualification conversion
 
Your desired scenario matches none of these. cv means "const and/or volatile combination"
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2343208/can-you-catch-an-exception-by-the-type-of-a-conversion-operator