Take an ordinary struct (or class) with Plain Old Data types and objects as members. Note that there is no default constructor defined.
struct Foo
{
int x;
int y;
double z;
string str;
};
Now if I declare an instance f on the stack and attempt to print its contents:
{
Foo f;
std::cout << f.x << " " << f.y << " " << f.z << f.str << std::endl;
}
The result is garbage data printed for x, y, and z. And the string is default initialized to be empty. As expected.
If I create an instance of a shared_ptr<Foo> using make_shared and print:
{
shared_ptr<Foo> spFoo = make_shared<Foo>();
cout << spFoo->x << " " << spFoo->y << " " << spFoo->z << spFoo->str << endl;
}
Then, x, y, and z are all 0. Which makes it appear that shared_ptr performs a default initialization (zero init) on each member after the object instance is constructed. At least that's what I observe with Visual Studio's compiler.
Is this standard for C++? Or would it be necessary to have an explicit constructor or explicit ={} statement after instantiation to guarantee zero-init behavior across all compilers?
If you see e.g. this std::make_shared reference you will see that
The object is constructed as if by the expression
::new (pv) T(std::forward<Args>(args)...), wherepvis an internalvoid*pointer to storage suitable to hold an object of typeT.
That means std::make_shared<Foo>() basically does new Foo(). That is, it value initializes the structure which leads to the zeroing of the non-class member variables.
To be more precise, std::make_shared employes value initialization syntax,
The object is constructed as if by the expression
::new (pv) T(std::forward<Args>(args)...)
For Foo with an empty initializer list, that means all its members with built-in type will be zero-initialized, and std::string will be default-initialized.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45366323/does-make-shared-do-a-default-initialization-zero-init-for-each-member-variabl