How to rethrow the inner exception of a TargetInvocationException without losing the stack trace

邮差的信 提交于 2019-11-26 20:25:57

问题


I have many methods which are calling using Delegate.DynamicInvoke. Some of these methods make database calls and I would like to have the ability to catch a SqlException and not catch the TargetInvocationException and hunt through its inners to find what's actually gone wrong.

I was using this method to rethrow but it clears the stack trace:

 try
 {
      return myDelegate.DynamicInvoke(args);
 }
 catch(TargetInvocationException ex)
 {
     Func<TargetInvocationException, Exception> getInner = null;
     getInner =
        delegate(TargetInvocationException e)
        {
        if (e.InnerException is TargetInvocationException)
            return getInner((TargetInvocationException) e.InnerException);

         return e.InnerException;
        };

     Exception inner = getInner(ex);
     inner.PreserveStackTrace();
     throw inner;
 }

The PreserveStackTrace method is an extension method I fixed up thanks to another post (I don't know what it actually does). However, this doesn't appear to preserve the trace either:

public static void PreserveStackTrace(this Exception e)
{
    var ctx = new StreamingContext(StreamingContextStates.CrossAppDomain);
    var mgr = new ObjectManager(null, ctx);
    var si = new SerializationInfo(e.GetType(), new FormatterConverter());

    e.GetObjectData(si, ctx);
    mgr.RegisterObject(e, 1, si);
    mgr.DoFixups(); 
}

回答1:


If you just want to re-throw an inner exception preserving its stack trace, you can do it with a method like this:

public static void Rethrow(this Exception ex)
{
  typeof(Exception).GetMethod("PrepForRemoting",
      BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance)
      .Invoke(ex, new object[0]);
  throw ex;
}

This technique is used by Rx (and is exposed by them as an extension method Exception.PrepareForRethrow) and is also used by the Async CTP by its automatic-unwrapping system (without a publicly-exposed API).

Note, however, that this technique is technically unsupported. Hopefully Microsoft will add an official API for this in the future. A suggestion has been opened on Microsoft Connect if you would like to vote for it.

Update: An official API has been added to .NET 4.5: ExceptionDispatchInfo.




回答2:


You need to keep in mind why .NET wraps the exception with a TargetInvocationException instead of just letting the original exception through. There's a really good reason for that, it isn't obvious where the real reason for the exception came from. Was it because the DynamicInvoke() call is borked? Not unlikely, there's nothing that the compiler can do to ensure that the correct arguments were passed. Or did the invoked target method throw all by itself?

You need to know both to judge the real reason for the exception. Intentionally hiding the TargetInvocationException is going to give you a hard time to diagnose the source of the trouble if it was indeed a problem with the DynamicInvoke() call. Avoid doing this.




回答3:


IIRC it is not possible to preserve exception completely, however stack trace can be preserved with some reflection. Here is blog post describing how to do it: http://iridescence.no/post/Preserving-Stack-Traces-When-Re-Throwing-Inner-Exceptions.aspx



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4555599/how-to-rethrow-the-inner-exception-of-a-targetinvocationexception-without-losing

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!