Android FragmentTransaction.addToBackStack confusion

问题

I was studying Fragments and got little confused on differentiating FragmentTransaction.replace(id, fragment, tag) and FragmentTransaction.addToBackStack(tag) calls. Lets say that my current fragment is FragmentA and then I loaded FragmentB. I want that in future, when I need to load FragmentA, I don't have to reload it. Just load the old one in old state. I used the following code segment:

public void loadFragment(Fragment fragmentB, String tag) {
    FragmentManager fm = getSupportFragmentManager();
    View fragmentContainer = findViewById(R.id.fragment_container);

    FragmentTransaction ft = fm.beginTransaction();
    ft.replace(fragmentContainer.getId(), fragmentB, tag);

    ft.addToBackStack(tag);

    ft.commit();
}

Now I am confused, where should I add the string tag? In replace() or in addToBackStack() or in both calls? Can you explain the difference between these two tag places?

回答1:

Can you explain the difference between these two tag places?

The documentation for addToBackStack is pretty clear:

An optional name for this back stack state, or null.

While for replace:

Optional tag name for the fragment, to later retrieve the fragment with FragmentManager.findFragmentByTag(String).

So these two parameters are independent, one identifies the back stack, while the other identifies the fragment within Activity's FragmentManager.

Your code seems correct from this point of view, just that I would not search the fragmentContainer view by its id, only to use then its id for replacing the fragment. Make it simpler:

public void loadFragment(Fragment fragmentB, String tag) {
    FragmentManager fm = getSupportFragmentManager();
    FragmentTransaction ft = fm.beginTransaction();
    ft.replace(R.id.fragment_container, fragmentB, tag);

    ft.addToBackStack(null);

    ft.commit();
}

In case you don't need to identify this back stack later on, pass null for addToBackStack. At least I'm always doing it.

回答2:

In this example you don't need to add tags as identification. Just do:

ft.replace(R.id.fragment_container,fragmentB);
ft.addToBackStack(null);
ft.commit();

The tag as identification is commonly used when you want to add a fragment without a UI.

回答3:

Param passed to addToBackStack() can be used to retrieve the whole BackStackEntry object, not just a single fragment. In order to set the fragment tag, consider using 3-param versions of add(int, Fragment, String) and replace(int, Fragment, String)

Prior to adding the Fragment you will be able to check if this Fragment is already in the backstack using :

 getFragmentMangager().findFragmentByTag(SettingsFragment.TAG);

This will return null if the Fragment is not already added.

回答4:

Passing null to addtoBackStack(null) means adding the fragment in the Fragment Stack but not adding any TAG which could be further use to identify the particular fragment in a stack before adding again.

    .addToBackStack(null);

But passing TAG to addToBackStack helps in identifying the fragment in Fragment stack by TAG. Like

.addToBackStack(FragmentName.TAG);

Now we can check the fragment before adding it to the Stack :

 getFragmentManager().findFragmentByTag(SettingsFragment.TAG);

This will return null if the Fragment is not already added.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14460109/android-fragmenttransaction-addtobackstack-confusion

标签

android

android-fragments

fragmenttransaction