Divide Foreach into threads sample

邮差的信 提交于 2019-12-04 13:07:49

If .NET 4.0 is available you can just use the Parallel.ForEach construct.

If not, processing this in parallel is as simple as using the ThreadPool class, with some additional work for synchronization:

int tasks = 0; // keep track of number of active tasks
object locker = new object(); // synchronization object

foreach(var order1 in dtOrders.AsEnumerable())
{
    lock(locker) tasks++; // added a new task
    var order = order1; // local copy to avoid data races
    ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(
       o =>
       {          
            string orderNumber = order["OrderNumber"].ToString();
            string orderResult = SearchResultByOrderNumber(orderNumber);
            DataRow dr = dtResult.NewRow();
            dr["OrderNumber"] = orderNumber;
            dr["OrderResult"] = orderResult;

            lock(locker) // update shared data structure and signal termination
            {
                dtResult.Rows.Add(dr);
                tasks--;
                Monitor.Pulse(locker);
            }                
       });
}

// barrier to wait for all tasks to finish
lock(locker)
{
   while(tasks > 0) Monitor.Wait(locker); 
}

You could use the CountdownEvent which will block the current thread, until the count is 0:

var sync = new object();
var cd = new CountDownEvent(dtOrders.Rows.Count);

foreach(var order in dtOrders)
{
    var dr = dtResult.NewRow();
    dr["OrderNumber"] = order["OrderNumber"].ToString();

    ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(o => 
    {
        dr["OrderResult"] = SearchResultByOrderNumber(dr["OrderNumber"].ToString());

        lock(sync) dtResult.Rows.Add(dr);
        cd.Signal();
    });
}

cd.Wait();
  • The count value is set in the constructor.
  • cd.Signal() decrement the count by one.
  • cd.Wait() blocks the current thread until count is 0.
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!