问题
I'm not sure where I should implement the caching in my repository pattern.
Should I implement it in the service-logic or in the repository?
GUI -> BusinessLogic (Services) -> DataAccess (Repositories)
回答1:
I would handle it in the repository/data access layer. The reasoning is because it isn't up to the business layer on where to get the data from, that is the job of the repository. The repository will then decide where to get the data from, the cache (if it's not too old) or from the live data source based on the circumstances of the data access logic.
It's a data access concern more than a business logic issue.
回答2:
It's a good idea not to put the caching logic directly into your repository, as that violates the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) and Separation of Concerns. SRP essentially states that your classes should only have one reason to change. If you conflate the concerns of data access and caching policy in the same class, then if either of these needs to change you'll need to touch the class. You'll also probably find that you're violating the DRY principle, since it's easy to have caching logic spread out among many different repository methods, and if any of it needs to change, you end up having to change many methods.
The better approach is to use the Proxy or Strategy pattern to apply the caching logic in a separate type, for instance a CachedRepository, which then uses the actual db-centric repository as needed when the cache is empty. I've written two articles which demonstrate how to implement this using .NET/C#, which you will find on my blog, here:
- http://ardalis.com/introducing-the-cachedrepository-pattern
- http://ardalis.com/building-a-cachedrepository-via-strategy-pattern
If you prefer video, I also describe the pattern in the Proxy Design Pattern on Pluralsight, here:
- http://pluralsight.com/training/courses/TableOfContents?courseName=patterns-library
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3442102/repository-pattern-caching