How can browsers understand the em unit when used in a responsive image?
<img alt="A giraffe" src="giraffe.jpg"
srcset="giraffe@1.5x.jpg 600w, giraffe@2x.jpg 800w, [etc.]"
sizes="(max-width: 40em) 40em">
This validates, and I'm not seeing warnings in browser consoles. But if the whole point of the image preloader is to fetch images before the CSS is downloaded and parsed, what does the browser use for em?
Is it just its default font-size that it applies to <html>? Should I use rem for clarity? Is there a difference between the two when the user zooms?
This isn't theoretical; I'm using em in my media query breakpoints, and some images are constrained by a container sized for optimal line length (using em, of course).
I checked the spec, but it's remarkably terse on the new responsive image features.
I bent the ears of the guys inside the official W3C #respimg chatroom, and this is what they had to say:
<Tigt> Pardon me folks, I had a question about how
emis interpreted when used insidesizes
<TabAtkins> Tigt: Same as in Media Queries - they're relative to the initial font size.
<TabAtkins> (Not the font size on <html>, the initial font size, as set by the user's personal settings.)<Wilto> 16px almost everywhere, so long as you haven’t changed the
font-sizeofhtml.
<TabAtkins> Tigt: rem is treated identical to em here.
So the speed-read is:
- When used in
sizesor media queries,emandremare both specced to mean "the user's defaultfont-size. - The actual
emorremthat controls how the image is laid out on the page can end up different if your CSS changes it - This means one should not change the default size of
emif they want to give the image preloader truthful information
This media query expresses that style sheet is usable on screen and handheld devices if the width of the viewport is greater than 20em.
@media handheld and (min-width: 20em), screen and (min-width: 20em) { … }The ‘em’ value is relative to the initial value of ‘font-size’.
5.1.1. Font-relative lengths: the ‘em’, ‘ex’, ‘ch’, ‘rem’ units
Aside from ‘rem’ (which refers to the font-size of the root element), the font-relative lengths refer to the font metrics of the element on which they are used. The exception is when they occur in the value of the ‘font-size’ property itself, in which case they refer to the computed font metrics of the parent element (or the computed font metrics corresponding to the initial values of the ‘font’ property, if the element has no parent).
em unit
Equal to the computed value of the ‘font-size’ property of the element on which it is used.
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#font-relative-lengths
em css units are equal to the font size of the current element. The font-size property is inherited. Therefore the element (img in this case) will be sized according to 40 times the font-size property. If the user zooms the page (which increases the font size) the em unit's update to that of the font-size property automatically.
The base font size will be determined by the browser, if the browser is running on windows on mac and the user has not changed the font size then base font size will be 16px (usually). On Linux, BSD or any other system the font size will be set by the desktop environment and can vary.
So while conservatively you could assume that the font size is 16px, in a lot of cases you would be wrong.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30653280/how-do-responsive-images-work-with-em-supplied-as-a-length-in-sizes