问题
This question already has an answer here:
- favicon.png vs favicon.ico - why should I use PNG instead of ICO? 8 answers
In a HTML5 document, which favicon format do you recommend and why? I want it to be supported by IE7 and all the modern browsers.
Also, when using .png, do I need to specify the type (type="image/png")?
回答1:
For compatibility with all browsers stick with .ico.
.png is getting more and more support though as it is easier to create using multiple programs.
for .ico
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="http://example.com/myicon.ico" />
for .png, you need to specify the type
<link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="http://example.com/image.png" />
回答2:
See here: Cross Browser favicon
Thats the way to go:
<link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="http://www.example.com/image.png"><!-- Major Browsers -->
<!--[if IE]><link rel="SHORTCUT ICON" href="http://www.example.com/alternateimage.ico"/><![endif]--><!-- Internet Explorer-->
回答3:
I know this is an old question.
Here's another option - attending to different platform requirements - Source
<link rel='shortcut icon' type='image/vnd.microsoft.icon' href='/favicon.ico'> <!-- IE -->
<link rel='apple-touch-icon' type='image/png' href='/icon.57.png'> <!-- iPhone -->
<link rel='apple-touch-icon' type='image/png' sizes='72x72' href='/icon.72.png'> <!-- iPad -->
<link rel='apple-touch-icon' type='image/png' sizes='114x114' href='/icon.114.png'> <!-- iPhone4 -->
<link rel='icon' type='image/png' href='/icon.114.png'> <!-- Opera Speed Dial, at least 144×114 px -->
This is the broadest approach I have found so far.
Ultimately the decision depends on your own needs. Ask yourself, who is your target audience?
UPDATE May 27, 2018: As expected, time goes by and things change. But there's good news too. I found a tool called Real Favicon Generator that generates all the required lines for the icon to work on all modern browsers and platforms. It doesn't handle backwards compatibility though.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6121725/favicon-ico-or-png-correct-tags